Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vk6rbl$4akb$5@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: ABC settles "rape" claim re: Pres. Elect. Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:45:40 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 105 Message-ID: <vk6rbl$4akb$5@dont-email.me> References: <Pine.NEB.4.64.2412142206100.6565@panix3.panix.com> <vjn1kf$lhqc$1@dont-email.me> <cm60mjhbvhu5konplgv0mj5iu13s0m4g83@4ax.com> <vjpom7$17gl4$2@dont-email.me> <kmr2mj58bbl1s4onjf5a5n3b8thcu4dkok@4ax.com> <vjsahg$1qjmm$4@dont-email.me> <mtf5mjlb1bt0btrh12bgpu02olfu3u4g4q@4ax.com> <vjuqvo$11fs4$2@solani.org> <ad48mjpnhn7pqr9vvabui3j0kvo0dpccos@4ax.com> <vk1kt7$2uqie$3@dont-email.me> <jenamjpnj7gvl8kle6aprtb96bsgpt3jj0@4ax.com> <vk4cdp$3ifl6$5@dont-email.me> <35ndmj91mc14b2eumun869idcm3gc910lm@4ax.com> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 17:45:42 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c09581885a1d1bef3213f8a69e161dc8"; logging-data="141963"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/QuZiVyfku23Dr/TJtWuwCFIKSy66VRO0=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:DzIsUafXHAWtK449QXWfo3K1dHY= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <35ndmj91mc14b2eumun869idcm3gc910lm@4ax.com> Bytes: 5976 On 12/21/2024 10:20 AM, NoBody wrote: > On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:18:31 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> > wrote: > >> On 12/20/2024 7:07 AM, NoBody wrote: >>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:24:55 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 12/19/2024 7:29 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 07:50:15 -0800, suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 12/18/2024 4:28 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:57:19 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 12/17/2024 7:31 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 12:40:22 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 12/16/2024 7:22 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 16:54:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman" >>>>>>>>>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> George Snuffalapogous had stated Mr. Trump (not President >>>>>>>>>>>>> at that time) had been found guilty of "rape", when, well, >>>>>>>>>>>>> we all know the legal technicalities and definition and >>>>>>>>>>>>> specific legal issues. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> He did not say "guilty". >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump has been found liable for defaming the victim of >>>>>>>>>>>> that rape by a jury. It's been affirmed by a judge. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The NBC Blue Network will pay $15 million to... his >>>>>>>>>>>>> Presidential library... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-abc-george-stephanopoulos-lawsuit-defamation-b2664508.html >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not buying what the judge wrote last year that the plaintiff proved >>>>>>>>>>>> "rape" as commonly understood by the public even though no rape had >>>>>>>>>>>> occurred using the legal definition of "rape". The jury was asked to >>>>>>>>>>>> make a specific finding of "rape" and they said no. She still won the >>>>>>>>>>>> case on other points even if not on that point. The judge was wrong to >>>>>>>>>>>> second guess the jury here on the finding they made on a specific set of >>>>>>>>>>>> facts. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> From your cited article: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "“Donald Trump has been found liable for defaming the victim of that >>>>>>>>>>> rape by a jury,” Stephonopoulos said on ABC’s This Week at the time. >>>>>>>>>>> “It’s been affirmed by a judge.” >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Juries in New York found Trump liable for defaming and sexually >>>>>>>>>>> abusing E Jean Carroll after he repeatedly called her a liar for >>>>>>>>>>> speaking publicly about allegations that he assaulted her in the >>>>>>>>>>> 1990s. Trump has appealed the nearly $90 million in judgments against >>>>>>>>>>> him. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Last year, the judge overseeing those cases wrote that Carroll’s >>>>>>>>>>> failure to “prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New >>>>>>>>>>> York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr Trump >>>>>>>>>>> ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’” >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> “Indeed, as the evidence at trial ... makes clear, the jury found that >>>>>>>>>>> Mr Trump in fact did exactly that,” US District Judge Lewis Kaplan >>>>>>>>>>> wrote." >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Honestly Trump has a case against the judge as well. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What redeeming aspect of Trump's character did George falsely besmirch? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If you need the facts of ABC admitted lie explained to you, you're not >>>>>>>>> worth the bytes it would take. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Your President-elect forcibly finger fucked her. Explain *that* fact. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Trump was not convicted of rape. ABC said he was. They lied. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> End of story. >>>>>>> >>>>>> In other jurisdictions it's considered rape/ >>>>> >>>>> No one cares. He was charge and found not guilty. >>>>> >>>>> End of story. >>>> >>>> Well, you're right that not many care about the technical 'not guilty'. >>> >>> It's not technical. It's fact. Trying to spin otherwise is engaging >>> in technicalities. >> >> It's a fact that NY law makes a misleading technical distinction. >> > > Laughter. > > Go ahead and explain it for us. We think you don't really want an explanation.