| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vk9k4j$mlm8$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Ian J. Ball" <ijball@mac.invalid> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2024-12-20 (Friday) Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 10:00:51 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 41 Message-ID: <vk9k4j$mlm8$3@dont-email.me> References: <UBI20241220@dont-email.me> <vk723k$4q45$1@dont-email.me> <vk793v$1jga2$1@solani.org> <vk7bqh$757d$1@dont-email.me> <vk9f4q$mhcc$5@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 19:00:52 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f6740dcbd753b349abc9ca8ea0bc2cdd"; logging-data="743112"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+qp2I6IlO47dHk3svheGiM" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:cfMwAafwuT5qpXPQNwtUl+LfYTs= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vk9f4q$mhcc$5@dont-email.me> Bytes: 3016 On 12/22/24 8:35 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote: > Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote: >> On 12/21/24 12:40 PM, suzeeq wrote: >>> On 12/21/2024 10:40 AM, Ian J. Ball wrote: > >>>> DOOL - "Doug III" goes to Leo Stark to sell the necklace, and Leo >>>> tries to talk him into returning the necklace, but I guess Doug III >>>> has debts to pay off!! Holly discusses Tate, and Sophia, with Maggie. >>>> I wasn't entirely sure, but it sounded like Tate talked Sophia into an >>>> abortion (across state lines?) - and the show was pathetically preachy >>>> on the subject of parental consent, which all normal people are >>>> completely in favor of. > >>> Yes, but many states where it's legal, still require parental conset >>> under a certaion age. > >> Read that again - I'm saying regular people support parental consent laws. > >> This is another area where the Left is laughably inane - they don't >> think kids should buy cigarettes or alcohol, and (generally) seem to >> support parental consent for tattoos and cosmetic surgery, but think >> kids should have abortions and sex change operations without their >> parents' consent. It's asinine. > > You're a lunatic. Laws on prohibition of achohol sales were originally > written by conservatives for supposed religious reasons. However, > teenagers are genetically predisposed to STOOPID and don't require > assistance from intoxicating substances. > > Tobacco use -- addictive but not behavior altering -- shouldn't be > prohibited, but again, to the extent that there were early laws > prohibitting tobacco sales and use, they came from conservatives. So, you're in favor of selling cigies to minors? Got it. > Where the hell did you ever get the idea that the church lady isn't > there to impose behavioral restrictions upon everybody else? As usual, I have no idea what point you are trying to make here... [roll]