Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vk9k4j$mlm8$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Ian J. Ball" <ijball@mac.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2024-12-20 (Friday)
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 10:00:51 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <vk9k4j$mlm8$3@dont-email.me>
References: <UBI20241220@dont-email.me> <vk723k$4q45$1@dont-email.me>
 <vk793v$1jga2$1@solani.org> <vk7bqh$757d$1@dont-email.me>
 <vk9f4q$mhcc$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 19:00:52 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f6740dcbd753b349abc9ca8ea0bc2cdd";
	logging-data="743112"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+qp2I6IlO47dHk3svheGiM"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cfMwAafwuT5qpXPQNwtUl+LfYTs=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vk9f4q$mhcc$5@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3016

On 12/22/24 8:35 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:

> Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:
>> On 12/21/24 12:40 PM, suzeeq wrote:
>>> On 12/21/2024 10:40 AM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
> 
>>>> DOOL - "Doug III" goes to Leo Stark to sell the necklace, and Leo
>>>> tries to talk him into returning the necklace, but I guess Doug III
>>>> has debts to pay off!! Holly discusses Tate, and Sophia, with Maggie.
>>>> I wasn't entirely sure, but it sounded like Tate talked Sophia into an
>>>> abortion (across state lines?) - and the show was pathetically preachy
>>>> on the subject of parental consent, which all normal people are
>>>> completely in favor of.
> 
>>> Yes, but many states where it's legal, still require parental conset
>>> under a certaion age.
> 
>> Read that again - I'm saying regular people support parental consent laws.
> 
>> This is another area where the Left is laughably inane - they don't
>> think kids should buy cigarettes or alcohol, and (generally) seem to
>> support parental consent for tattoos and cosmetic surgery, but think
>> kids should have abortions and sex change operations without their
>> parents' consent. It's asinine.
> 
> You're a lunatic. Laws on prohibition of achohol sales were originally
> written by conservatives for supposed religious reasons. However,
> teenagers are genetically predisposed to STOOPID and don't require
> assistance from intoxicating substances.
> 
> Tobacco use -- addictive but not behavior altering -- shouldn't be
> prohibited, but again, to the extent that there were early laws
> prohibitting tobacco sales and use, they came from conservatives.

So, you're in favor of selling cigies to minors? Got it.

> Where the hell did you ever get the idea that the church lady isn't
> there to impose behavioral restrictions upon everybody else?

As usual, I have no idea what point you are trying to make here... [roll]