| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vka44r$qnkv$7@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: clams casino <cc@invalid.cc> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking Subject: Re: Redefining eternity Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 15:34:03 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 81 Message-ID: <vka44r$qnkv$7@dont-email.me> References: <vk1tfp$30dqi$4@dont-email.me> <a5c195b4-5f1d-ce46-a4ab-25f12b535d3b@example.net> <vk4mlr$3kf3a$13@dont-email.me> <9a7c2c29-afd7-f0bc-6947-3822102eb1ea@example.net> <vk4svv$3lqg0$2@dont-email.me> <5299c684-6df9-c0f5-43b8-edf86b52e1c6@example.net> <vk71hf$4rti$21@dont-email.me> <88f65d48-b3f1-d594-3d1c-5fe8d997039b@example.net> <vk7l0j$96pv$4@dont-email.me> <7862945cfea8925ff33fea15e39bcd45@www.novabbs.org> <vk7pku$a6oo$1@dont-email.me> <vk9oiv$nj8e$1@dont-email.me> <vk9p8g$op6a$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 23:34:04 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ff0aa50c28eae1a1c3fb9a2c2ec79edc"; logging-data="876191"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+CTCsEfFrWk7v/LFX7Fp7nPiieNv4pSkU=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Lf5nDHWxa8mBJ365WBRYYBj1i9A= In-Reply-To: <vk9p8g$op6a$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3973 On 12/22/2024 12:28 PM, Bruce wrote: > On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 10:50:19 -0700, clams casino <cc@invalid.cc> > wrote: > >> On 12/21/2024 6:22 PM, Bruce wrote: >>> On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 00:26:38 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote: >>> >>>> He wasn't interested in talking about other posters and dissing them. >>> >>> That's a nice way of saying he was so self-centered, self-absorbed or >>> whatever you want to call it that he was barely aware other people in >>> RFC existed, except to the degree that they fed his need for >>> attention. >> >> Making him precisely the same solipsist as the charter members of the >> sisterhood. >> >> His only flaw - not being subordinate to them. >> >> As for other people existing, he certainly did his best to try and >> recover his relationship with Bryan, albeit unsuccessfully. > > Can you imagine John discussing a topic other than John himself, here? > Any topic? Sure - his hand-dipped chocolates. His Leaf. His porch remodel. His music system. Etc... >> He also engaged with all on a lot of other subjects. > > What, shaving his balls? His auto-erotic adventures? His meds and how > he did or did not take them? His tenants? It was all me, me, me and > very repetitive. Sure - his hand-dipped chocolates. His Leaf. His porch remodel. His music system. Etc... >> Dave Smith exists in a state of constant familial reminisence here, and >> the Dataw queen and her henchwoman Carol are prone to state their likes >> and dislikes on every foodstuff known to mankind. >> >> Iow - just how much personal genuflection are you proposing need be >> offered to the ruling RFC class insure a non-bullying experience here? > > I don't like their attitude either. I've criticised them and made fun > of them. That immediately lead to their killfile, because they take > themselves very seriously and have little sense of humour. All true. I think physical mockery is somewhat more effective, but not a lot. >>>> This made folks here even more angry. It's a rather interesting thing. >>> >>> He didn't anger me. His bullies angered me more. But he was a weak, >>> odd fruitcake. And we all know how the RFC bullies deal with people >>> they perceive as weak. >> >> This is true, and this is reason enough for them to get as much slop >> back on their plates as the heaping servings of control and mockery they >> ladle out themselves. >> >> Right??? > > It depends how. > That it does!