Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vkbp5a$17nub$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> Newsgroups: sci.math,sci.logic,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024) Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:38:50 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 63 Message-ID: <vkbp5a$17nub$1@dont-email.me> References: <S4KdnWq7DcVrNv76nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <7cicneYW4rajM_76nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <vk0kgv$12h6t$1@solani.org> <vk0klk$12h6t$2@solani.org> <lspr5eF18tuU2@mid.individual.net> <_HedndTHTdur8vX6nZ2dnZfqn_UAAAAA@giganews.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:38:50 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a98df09d6e85156cf764233936e2fdc0"; logging-data="1302475"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+eSmk3AbnLmc0oyX0EUpVqajuB0IRLnvI=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:WxVGp7cInfWdocVnb8AQfv4Hpps= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <_HedndTHTdur8vX6nZ2dnZfqn_UAAAAA@giganews.com> Bytes: 3585 On 22/12/2024 20:57, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On 12/21/2024 10:50 PM, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am Donnerstag000019, 19.12.2024 um 09:14 schrieb Mild Shock: >>> >>> Which is ironic, since Googl Groups got shot >>> down, and many Newsgroup servers have a limited >>> retention time anyway. So large posts have not >>> >>> any Search Engine Optimization (SEO) advantage at all. >>> >>> At best you can use Newsgroups as a public >>> notebook now for short time communication over USENET, >>> where pages get automatically erased after a while. >> >> This is actually wrong, since UseNet content is copied to other >> datebases very often. >> >> For instance: many 'forums' on the Web are actually not filled by lively >> discussions over the web, but are copies from the UseNet. >> >> Also private copies do exist and are often filled into database >> programs, which are hosted on privately owned hardware. >> >> All of these copies are independent from each other and also from their >> sources in the UseNet. >> >> In effect UseNet content can never be removed from the face of the Earth >> entirely, once it is written. >> >> It can actually last longer than the pyramids and can never be removed >> by, say, malicious governments or similar. >> >> But the server themselves store only a limited subset from the UseNet >> traffic. But this does not say, that anything could vanish, just because >> it isn't in the database of the UseNet servers anymore. >> >> This is different to any other form of communication and is something, >> what makes the UseNet unique. >> >> Those e.g. 'malicious governments' would had this shut-down long ago, >> supposed that would be possible. >> >> But the UseNet is actually a part from the TCP/IP protocol stack and >> similar to the e-mail protocols. >> >> This can only be removed, if the internet protocols would be written >> entirely new. >> >> But that is next to impossible, because of the zillions of devices using >> these protocols. > > Yeah, that's pretty accurate. Pretty accurately not even wrong. You spamming cunts and true paladins of the shithole for everybody. I do wish you all happy holidays and an ass cancer. *Plonk* -Julio