Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vkc49q$19n3s$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: ABC settles "rape" claim re: Pres. Elect. Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 11:48:57 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 79 Message-ID: <vkc49q$19n3s$2@dont-email.me> References: <vjuqvo$11fs4$2@solani.org> <BPWcnY5y78tvh_76nZ2dnZfqn_QAAAAA@giganews.com> <vjvt1r$2holo$1@dont-email.me> <7g48mj9e1lq6b2qi5pjufskcb1osrcrfpk@4ax.com> <95n8mjdo7s1dl7hrlq2rlb25tca1pll0h7@4ax.com> <mnt8mj14n85aim3r2m0rahrha75s2mvomt@4ax.com> <e8namjd22k2o9kfnsugn82kmti2m2rsovq@4ax.com> <vk4c38$3ifl6$4@dont-email.me> <a2ndmj97tmjflpvjdte7mh5rvsro3o5egu@4ax.com> <vk6r7i$4akb$4@dont-email.me> <4ubgmjdmd8rdfictqu5il3pg60ns81746b@4ax.com> <vk9lf2$nssq$4@dont-email.me> <4klimjdulc9vbb00lkgjmdkqdml2ahork9@4ax.com> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 17:48:58 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="93814682aab7ab08ac282f150f0f8ffa"; logging-data="1367164"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19dNy7TioPb04ApJ1cb+B6lPB5k33o8ILA=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:EXWX+cZCaFbQHZWhe3F1/yO8c6o= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <4klimjdulc9vbb00lkgjmdkqdml2ahork9@4ax.com> Bytes: 4631 On 12/23/2024 7:25 AM, NoBody wrote: > On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 13:23:29 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> > wrote: > >> On 12/22/2024 10:27 AM, NoBody wrote: >>> On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:43:29 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 12/21/2024 10:19 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:12:54 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 12/20/2024 7:04 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:42:58 -0500, shawn >>>>>>> <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:53:45 -0500, EGK <memyself@null.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 07:31:32 -0500, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:31:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman" >>>>>>>>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2024 4:28 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:57:19 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . . . >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your President-elect forcibly finger fucked her. Explain *that* fact. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump was not convicted of rape. ABC said he was. They lied. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> End of story. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In other jurisdictions it's considered rape/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But he wasn't in other jurisdictions. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The harm to Donald Trump wws nominal. not $15 million worth. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ABC obviously felt otherwise given that they caved so quickly. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They didnt want to go through discovery and be exposed as the biased >>>>>>>>> organization most of the media is. ABC producers warned Stephanopolous not >>>>>>>>> to use the term "rape" and he just thumbed his nose at them and did it >>>>>>>>> repeatedly anyway. >>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2024/12/18/media/abc-parent-disney-didnt-think-it-would-beat-trump-in-court-report/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He could still likely have gotten away with it if he had said >>>>>>>> something like "I think he's guilty of rape" while still giving the >>>>>>>> official legal facts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Let's not forget he was verbally attacking a rape victim during the >>>>>>> interview. Way to go Boy George. >>>>>> >>>>>> No, he was verbally (albeit indirectly) attacking a rapist. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Did you see the interview? He was extremely aggressive towards her. >>>>> Disgraceful behavior. >>>> >>>> I agree. He was extremely aggressive towards her disgraceful behavior. >>>> >>> >>> What disgraceful bbehavior did she exhibit? >> >> She stonewalled his question by chanting a baseless accusation. >> > > What "baseless accusation"? > You have this completely backwards. Well, "backwards" is certainly what she was going for. She tried to turn his question ("How can a rapee support a rapist?") into shaming raped women for their "political choices". I can't even begin...