Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: zen cycle <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: RE: Re: Education that is in such short supply
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 12:30:34 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 66
Message-ID: <vkc6nr$19uvo$3@dont-email.me>
References: <nF_9P.30569$DPl.3116@fx13.iad>
 <7hehmjlr1s5rbbvr15vr6mdr0taqpe0v72@4ax.com> <ZKgaP.47691$EYNf.7217@fx11.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 18:30:36 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="51cddae0a99c79848e0f76e5a8f6ac4f";
	logging-data="1375224"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Ec69QzYsF/ZGr3BfLGYA0Nv2JXdAtd9I="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JIwEDwbwbSzmVlXyHip4C0Nmycs=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <ZKgaP.47691$EYNf.7217@fx11.iad>
Bytes: 3887

On 12/23/2024 12:04 PM, cyclintom wrote:
> On Sun Dec 22 17:59:02 2024 Jeff Liebermann  wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 20:30:11 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Harris made 38% fewer electoral votes than Trump which
>>> is 86 electoral votes than Harris's 226. Since Krygowski
>>> is too stupid to understand 228/312 = 138% larger,
>>> 86/226 is also 38%.
>>
>> That's really amazing.  How did you calculate that Harris had 38%
>> fewer electoral votes than Trump?  The correct "difference" is 16%.
>>
>> <https://www.google.com/search?q=2024+presidential+election+electoral+votes>
>> Harris received 226 electoral votes while Trump received 312 votes.
>>
>> The difference between the Trump and Harris vote is:
>>    312 - 226 = 86
>> fewer votes.  You should have written 86 electoral votes *fewer* than.
>>
>> The percent fewer electoral votes cast for Harris was:
>>    (312 - 226) / (312 + 226) = 86 / 538 = 16% fewer electoral votes.
>> You mistakenly wrote 228 instead of 226 and your calculations defy
>> explanation.
>>
>> Percent of the difference is NOT the way it's normally described.
>> Instead, it's more common to see the percent of the total vote for
>> each candidate, which would be:
>>    312 / (312 + 226) = 312 / 538 = 58%
>>    226 / (312 + 226) = 226 / 538 = 42%
>> The percent difference is:
>>    58% - 42% = 16%
>> between the two candidates.  This type of comparison only works when
>> there are two candidates.
>>
>> If you had attended college instead joining the USAF, you would have
>> received some classes in remedial arithmetic.
>>
>>> He and Liebermann agree that the device from Techtronics is the proper device.
>>
>> We also agree that it's spelled "Tektronix" which makes me wonder how
>> much experience you've had with commercial test equipment.  I guess
>> they didn't have test equipment at the 4 libraries you "read out".
>> Incidentally, Techtronics (TTI) does not manufacture test equipment,
>> cable length measuring equipment, or use light lines:
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Techtronic_Industries>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Lieberann, you should stop showing why you couldn't get a job in the hottest EE jon mstket in the world.
> 
> Could it be because you could spell Techtronix better than you could use one?

We know he didn't spell it techtronix...

>  What is you stupid excuse for not under standing how their wire fayult detector worked? 

He understands it better than you ever had the capacity to understand 
it. Once again, it doesn't use PWM.

> Show us another picture of your degree as if your entire job history didn't prove it a lie.

Tell us again how some allegedly genius software engineer calculated 
that a vote count of 312 to 226 is 75% to 25%.