Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:02:26 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <vkctmi$1eoa9$4@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vjrfcc$1m1b2$1@dont-email.me>
 <3c08ed64fa6193dc9ab6733b807a5c99a49810aa@i2pn2.org>
 <vjss56$1tr00$2@dont-email.me>
 <357a8740434fb6f1b847130ac3afbd33c850fc37@i2pn2.org>
 <vjv6fb$2dujf$2@dont-email.me>
 <b0c7449413fec43bc18e8d2d67da1c779a350bc2@i2pn2.org>
 <vk1cad$2srst$1@dont-email.me>
 <ceaaf003457afd2e381c8f115a4e691611162ffe@i2pn2.org>
 <vk3g0l$3cjvc$3@dont-email.me> <vk3lv1$3e9se$1@dont-email.me>
 <vk3vh6$3g0a3$1@dont-email.me> <vk4jfi$3k04r$4@dont-email.me>
 <d4d38bb75acc471a684759922b8f8d32707855a8@i2pn2.org>
 <vk6uu7$4f7v$1@dont-email.me>
 <cdd51ad73c172f40f3212801d7afd9eef8e60d47@i2pn2.org>
 <vk936n$khia$1@dont-email.me>
 <787067e5de3c455cb57389315b6821e96bcf86af@i2pn2.org>
 <f713f771-6cdd-44bb-90ab-7300d739f84b@tha.de>
 <1b6f89e7c35e4c9674af5a480e4bab6cb72e0915@i2pn2.org>
 <vkbalq$14tg7$2@dont-email.me>
 <733ce219e9d2422859035e5094a7b3e92eea9c47@i2pn2.org>
 <vkcsut$1eoa9$1@dont-email.me> <vkctbv$1el1r$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 01:02:26 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d7ce48cf38462b28073ed26d9c338b5a";
	logging-data="1532233"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/nRW2tYa9ixJhqB0SLVzXpBFve/sWxlbU="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IYVSY41kipcNUvBotIo7o1NSS54=
In-Reply-To: <vkctbv$1el1r$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3231

On 12/23/2024 3:56 PM, Moebius wrote:
> Am 24.12.2024 um 00:49 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
>> On 12/23/2024 6:32 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 12/23/24 4:31 AM, WM wrote:
>>>> On 23.12.2024 02:01, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 12/22/24 5:11 PM, WM wrote:
>>>>>> On 22.12.2024 20:10, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 12/22/24 8:11 AM, WM wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Find a natural number that is not in all intervals [1, n] which 
>>>>>>>> I use: ∀n ∈ ℕ [1, n].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But you can't use *ALL* intervals, becaue you need to use them 
>>>>>>> individually
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, I do as Cantor did.
>>>>
>>>>> No, you do what you THINK Cantor did,
>>>>
>>>> Show an n that I do not use with all intervals [1, n].
>>>
>>> The LAST one, which you say must exist to use your logic.
>>
>> LOL! n+1?
>>
>> Am I close here? Or way off?
> 
> Yeah, you are close to the edge.
> 
> See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51oPKLSuyQY

Does

{ 0, 1, 2, 3, ...}

equal:

{ 0 + 0, 0 + 1, 0 + 2, 0 + 3, ... }

Or just a big, NO! Minus any insults? lol! ;^D

Does WM mean that n is that infinite outside of the "limit" of the 
unsigned integers growing, or tending, toward unbounded infinity?