Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:10:31 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <vkcu5o$1eoaa$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>
 <3c08ed64fa6193dc9ab6733b807a5c99a49810aa@i2pn2.org>
 <vjss56$1tr00$2@dont-email.me>
 <357a8740434fb6f1b847130ac3afbd33c850fc37@i2pn2.org>
 <vjv6fb$2dujf$2@dont-email.me>
 <b0c7449413fec43bc18e8d2d67da1c779a350bc2@i2pn2.org>
 <vk1cad$2srst$1@dont-email.me>
 <ceaaf003457afd2e381c8f115a4e691611162ffe@i2pn2.org>
 <vk3g0l$3cjvc$3@dont-email.me> <vk3lv1$3e9se$1@dont-email.me>
 <vk3vh6$3g0a3$1@dont-email.me> <vk4jfi$3k04r$4@dont-email.me>
 <d4d38bb75acc471a684759922b8f8d32707855a8@i2pn2.org>
 <vk6uu7$4f7v$1@dont-email.me>
 <cdd51ad73c172f40f3212801d7afd9eef8e60d47@i2pn2.org>
 <vk936n$khia$1@dont-email.me>
 <787067e5de3c455cb57389315b6821e96bcf86af@i2pn2.org>
 <f713f771-6cdd-44bb-90ab-7300d739f84b@tha.de>
 <1b6f89e7c35e4c9674af5a480e4bab6cb72e0915@i2pn2.org>
 <vkbalq$14tg7$2@dont-email.me>
 <733ce219e9d2422859035e5094a7b3e92eea9c47@i2pn2.org>
 <vkcsut$1eoa9$1@dont-email.me> <vkctbv$1el1r$2@dont-email.me>
 <vkctmi$1eoa9$4@dont-email.me> <vkcu1i$1el1q$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 01:10:32 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d7ce48cf38462b28073ed26d9c338b5a";
	logging-data="1532234"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+eG8qk591IR0hKxQtuVyxe6947unwqu2k="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JDXHnzJ9ZgDfXqzejpg3tF7QFRY=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vkcu1i$1el1q$3@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3749

On 12/23/2024 4:08 PM, Moebius wrote:
> Am 24.12.2024 um 01:02 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
>> On 12/23/2024 3:56 PM, Moebius wrote:
>>> Am 24.12.2024 um 00:49 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
>>>> On 12/23/2024 6:32 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 12/23/24 4:31 AM, WM wrote:
>>>>>> On 23.12.2024 02:01, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 12/22/24 5:11 PM, WM wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 22.12.2024 20:10, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 12/22/24 8:11 AM, WM wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Find a natural number that is not in all intervals [1, n] 
>>>>>>>>>> which I use: ∀n ∈ ℕ [1, n].
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But you can't use *ALL* intervals, becaue you need to use them 
>>>>>>>>> individually
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, I do as Cantor did.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, you do what you THINK Cantor did,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Show an n that I do not use with all intervals [1, n].
>>>>>
>>>>> The LAST one, which you say must exist to use your logic.
>>>>
>>>> LOL! n+1?
>>>>
>>>> Am I close here? Or way off?
>>>
>>> Yeah, you are close to the edge.
>>>
>>> See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51oPKLSuyQY
>>
>> Does
>>
>> { 0, 1, 2, 3, ...}
>>
>> equal:
>>
>> { 0 + 0, 0 + 1, 0 + 2, 0 + 3, ... }
> 
> For all x e IR (and hence for all x e IN): 0 + x = x.
> 
> Hence { 0 + 0, 0 + 1, 0 + 2, 0 + 3, ... } = { 0, 1, 2, 3, ...}.
> 
> YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE FULL OF ... ooops... forget about THAT! :-P
> 
>> Does WM mean ...
> 
> Actually, I'm not interested in anything this asshole full of shit means 
> or doesn't mean, sorry.

Fair enough. Trying to engage with him (WM) is useless? While, 
conversing with you is, actually, productive?