Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vkcvn2$1fb92$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix6.panix.com!nan.users.panix.com!robomod!not-for-mail
From: Steve Bonine <spb@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: news.groups.proposals
Subject: Re: Unofficial request: MX Linux.
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 21:36:49 EST
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Approved: NGP Approval Key <ngp-approval-key@ngp.big-8.org>
Message-ID: <vkcvn2$1fb92$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vk9l8r$3s6tu$1@news.usenet.ovh>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader2.panix.com; posting-host="panix6.panix.com:166.84.1.6";
	logging-data="6986"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ajc34iU1p1mkMVVAk1e1RGKJ/4Q=
X-NGP-Policy: http://www.big-8.org/~ngp
X-NGP-Info-1: Send submissions to              ngp@nan.users.panix.com
X-NGP-Info-2: Send technical/policy queries to ngp-admin@nan.users.panix.com
X-Comment: Moderators do not necessarily agree or disagree with this article.
X-Robomod: STUMP <https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/stump>
X-Spam-Relay-Country: DE UA UA
Authentication-Results: mail1.panix.com; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com
Authentication-Results: mail1.panix.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=eternal-september.org
Authentication-Results: name/5AC885FD4E; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com
X-Original-Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 01:36:51 +0100 (CET)
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+q9cUyaJz5iusdlgAef1z9vnIEvdgPkdA=
X-Auth: PGPMoose V2.0 PGP news.groups.proposals
 iEYEARECAAYFAmdqHkIACgkQrPkQbuk9hdvfSgCgwrFsIqi44WNRzzlw/5ASdKjI
 CHEAnA3sFZEy5tTWizV+lUVwBTZwekOS
 =DpRp
Bytes: 2653
Lines: 18

Yevgeniy S and Linux wrote:
> Hello news.groups.proposals!
> 
> I am using MX-Linux. According to Distrowatch it is No. 2 Linux distro 
> in the world, just after Mint.
> 
> Would it make sense to make MX-Linux newsgroup? Say 
> comp.os.linux.mx-linux? Or rather other newsgroups are preferable?

The question is . . . who would use it?  Are there people who are active 
on UseNet who would post to an MX-Linux-specific newsgroup?  Or are 
their information needs already being met by existing sources?

My inclination is that there are already enough information sources, 
including comp.os.linux.misc, that a separate newsgroup for the variant 
is not going to fly.  The way to prove me wrong is to post in the 
existing newsgroup(s) and find actual examples of people who would use a 
new group.