Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math,sci.logic,sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 17:37:20 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <vkd38g$1fvln$3@dont-email.me>
References: <S4KdnWq7DcVrNv76nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vk8q0b$innf$1@dont-email.me> <_HedndXHTdum8_X6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vkbovm$17knc$1@dont-email.me> <vkcucc$1eoa9$5@dont-email.me>
 <yBicnZtm8JJnmPf6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vkd0r5$1eoa9$13@dont-email.me> <vkd23n$1fbig$4@dont-email.me>
 <vkd318$1fvln$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 02:37:21 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d7ce48cf38462b28073ed26d9c338b5a";
	logging-data="1572535"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/KWNujJ6egrNUWyEt45J7DV08qSoJ8rYg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VmL/oNQaOTzrpySKTMtOsXF0xdM=
In-Reply-To: <vkd318$1fvln$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2240

On 12/23/2024 5:33 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 12/23/2024 5:17 PM, Moebius wrote:
>> Am 24.12.2024 um 01:56 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
>>> On 12/23/2024 4:53 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>
>>>> Julio is expected, and excepted, that's [his] style,
>>>> the rest of you are not excused.
>>>> So get out of here with that.
>>
>>> A "C" = nothing more than another meaning for the physical means of 
>>> procreation wrt a human female's private parts?
>>
>> I don't like that type of language: "cunt" is just like "prick". Imho 
>> we shouldn't use such (pejorative) words.*) Ross is right here (imho): 
>> "You are what you speak."
>>
>> Though there are exceptions to this rule.
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________________
>>
>> *) Actually, it's a matter of style. (->gracefulness, nobility).
> 
> agreed.

I got way to literal here.