Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 09:36:40 -0500
Organization: Peripheral Visions
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <vkegts$1tbea$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>   <vjrfcc$1m1b2$1@dont-email.me> <3c08ed64fa6193dc9ab6733b807a5c99a49810aa@i2pn2.org> <vjss56$1tr00$2@dont-email.me> <357a8740434fb6f1b847130ac3afbd33c850fc37@i2pn2.org> <vjv6fb$2dujf$2@dont-email.me> <b0c7449413fec43bc18e8d2d67da1c779a350bc2@i2pn2.org> <vk1cad$2srst$1@dont-email.me> <ceaaf003457afd2e381c8f115a4e691611162ffe@i2pn2.org> <vk3g0l$3cjvc$3@dont-email.me> <vk3lv1$3e9se$1@dont-email.me> <vk3vh6$3g0a3$1@dont-email.me> <vk4jfi$3k04r$4@dont-email.me> <d4d38bb75acc471a684759922b8f8d32707855a8@i2pn2.org> <vk6uu7$4f7v$1@dont-email.me> <cdd51ad73c172f40f3212801d7afd9eef8e60d47@i2pn2.org> <vk936n$khia$1@dont-email.me> <787067e5de3c455cb57389315b6821e96bcf86af@i2pn2.org> <f713f771-6cdd-44bb-90ab-7300d739f84b@tha.de> <1b6f89e7c35e4c9674af5a480e4bab6cb72e0915@i2pn2.org> <vkbalq$14tg7$2@dont-email.me> <733ce219e9d2422859035e5094a7b3e92eea9c47@i2pn2.org> <vke3bi$1q36j$2@dont-email.me> <md-cnZfuwoBJMPf6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Reply-To: erratic.howard@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 15:36:44 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fd635abed7f96deedac51282650bfb53";
	logging-data="2010570"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ndT6PE6S6t4ZVQNJN6q6IkAXDcdd2aHQ="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0OvXJ0VfhQIKYHPA5eY1Zg9xZjU=
X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb
X-ICQ: 1701145376
Bytes: 2562

Ross Finlayson wrote on 12/24/2024 :
> On 12/24/2024 02:45 AM, WM wrote:
>> On 23.12.2024 15:32, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 12/23/24 4:31 AM, WM wrote:
>>
>>>>>> No, I do as Cantor did.
>>>>
>>>>> No, you do what you THINK Cantor did,
>>>>
>>>> Show an n that I do not use with all intervals [1, n].
>>
>>> The LAST one, which you say must exist to use your logic.
>>
>> I do what Cantor did. There is no last one. You cannot show an n that I
>> do not use. There is none. Therefore all your arguing breaks down.
>>
>> Regards, WM
>>
>
> Cantor went insane, ....

Irrelevant.