Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 20:52:14 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <vkindt$2qe5i$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>
 <0e67005f-120e-4b3b-a4d2-ec4bbc1c5662@att.net> <vgab11$st52$3@dont-email.me>
 <ecffc7c0-05a2-42df-bf4c-8ae3c2f809d6@att.net> <vgb0ep$11df5$4@dont-email.me>
 <35794ceb-825a-45df-a55b-0a879cfe80ae@att.net> <vgfgpo$22pcv$1@dont-email.me>
 <40ac3ed2-5648-48c0-ac8f-61bdfd1c1e20@att.net> <vgg57o$25ovs$2@dont-email.me>
 <71fea361-0069-4a98-89a4-6de2eef62c5e@att.net> <vggh9v$27rg8$3@dont-email.me>
 <ff2c4d7c-33b4-4aad-a6b2-88799097b86b@att.net> <vghuoc$2j3sg$1@dont-email.me>
 <d79e791d-d670-4a5a-bd26-fdf72bcde6bc@att.net> <vgj4lk$2ova9$3@dont-email.me>
 <f154138e-4482-4267-9332-151e2fd9f1ba@att.net> <vgkoi7$b5pp$1@solani.org>
 <d780ead415ff3a62ccd9b606bcd743fea3d8002c@i2pn2.org>
 <vglf32$396r8$1@dont-email.me>
 <521668acd2ed6184f2f2e36f67fdb1bc3a997524@i2pn2.org>
 <vgni8n$3osmc$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 05:52:14 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="72bff690d08d044e67c8f5e452822306";
	logging-data="2963634"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19dNmul0zvx3Irx2rfzz2X81xTsLn/A0Cg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bhEok9ifqzLNjNw8ATZP2O9//ck=
In-Reply-To: <vgni8n$3osmc$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2456

On 11/9/2024 3:49 AM, WM wrote:
> On 08.11.2024 20:05, joes wrote:
>> Am Fri, 08 Nov 2024 17:43:15 +0100 schrieb WM:
> 
>>> I take it as evident that intervals of the measure 1/5 of the positive
>>> real axis will not, by any shuffling, cover the real axis completely,
>>> let alone infinitely often. I think who believes this is a deplorable
>>> fanatic if not a fool.
>> What is the measure you are using and what does it give for the real
>> axis?
> 
> The measure is the density 1/5 for every finite segment and its limit 1/5.

Huh? Keep in mind that Cantor Pairing works with any unsigned integer.