Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 12:36:31 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <vkjf3v$2umsm$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vjrfcc$1m1b2$1@dont-email.me>
 <3c08ed64fa6193dc9ab6733b807a5c99a49810aa@i2pn2.org>
 <vjss56$1tr00$2@dont-email.me>
 <357a8740434fb6f1b847130ac3afbd33c850fc37@i2pn2.org>
 <vjv6fb$2dujf$2@dont-email.me>
 <b0c7449413fec43bc18e8d2d67da1c779a350bc2@i2pn2.org>
 <vk1cad$2srst$1@dont-email.me>
 <ceaaf003457afd2e381c8f115a4e691611162ffe@i2pn2.org>
 <vk3g0l$3cjvc$3@dont-email.me> <vk3lv1$3e9se$1@dont-email.me>
 <vk3vh6$3g0a3$1@dont-email.me> <vk4jfi$3k04r$4@dont-email.me>
 <d4d38bb75acc471a684759922b8f8d32707855a8@i2pn2.org>
 <vk6uu7$4f7v$1@dont-email.me>
 <cdd51ad73c172f40f3212801d7afd9eef8e60d47@i2pn2.org>
 <vk936n$khia$1@dont-email.me>
 <787067e5de3c455cb57389315b6821e96bcf86af@i2pn2.org>
 <f713f771-6cdd-44bb-90ab-7300d739f84b@tha.de>
 <1b6f89e7c35e4c9674af5a480e4bab6cb72e0915@i2pn2.org>
 <vkbalq$14tg7$2@dont-email.me>
 <733ce219e9d2422859035e5094a7b3e92eea9c47@i2pn2.org>
 <vke3bi$1q36j$2@dont-email.me>
 <93150cff37c76c7c9f6c66d8ffd13dc8bc5c477f@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 12:36:32 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="26a2c5c5f7b2556246a56be7e13f3cc0";
	logging-data="3103638"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18biGRF9EfNX2Ss71uw+ACXtMYxvhU7cU0="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RkKQV5WTyJHOq5yRSi+GI1PZRyc=
In-Reply-To: <93150cff37c76c7c9f6c66d8ffd13dc8bc5c477f@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2650

On 24.12.2024 15:06, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 12/24/24 5:45 AM, WM wrote:
>> On 23.12.2024 15:32, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 12/23/24 4:31 AM, WM wrote:
>>
>>>>>> No, I do as Cantor did.
>>>>
>>>>> No, you do what you THINK Cantor did,
>>>>
>>>> Show an n that I do not use with all intervals [1, n].
>>
>>> The LAST one, which you say must exist to use your logic.
>>
>> I do what Cantor did. There is no last one. You cannot show an n that 
>> I do not use. There is none. Therefore all your arguing breaks down.
>>
> No, you do NOT do what Cantor did,

What n do I not use?

Regards, WM