| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vkjvq1$31vi7$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@gXXmail.com> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: 8 & 9 year old girls riding bicycles Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 11:21:18 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 93 Message-ID: <vkjvq1$31vi7$3@dont-email.me> References: <ou9kmj9ao77dhmuchaegbtd82lif0v9a9j@4ax.com> <vkdg2d$1m0k7$2@dont-email.me> <lsvmiuFufhiU1@mid.individual.net> <uf9lmjl75kherjggqk2pgf0netc7kli7t6@4ax.com> <vkfkma$23637$1@dont-email.me> <7jmmmjt7hpprlget22u82arlvstki1j6mn@4ax.com> <796nmj5lomcfvmor1mkhlin70mg4oogq9i@4ax.com> <imhnmj1sq016t0rlva36tjo22ignie2t90@4ax.com> <rpknmjtgaab3vig4rah0tul99lh44lkk0h@4ax.com> <vkhm89$2h8fe$2@dont-email.me> <vkhpof$2h1bh$5@dont-email.me> <vki72v$2jua1$1@dont-email.me> <5oapmjljd378rjvcie0md506ubk1g5324d@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 17:21:22 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f2f0b4d071c4681c8af9aec6f1d02d17"; logging-data="3210823"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19gQeWsvd9rQrnqGm7YzfPJbXdUXmugUp4=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:W3OzswUy6iJbBuTYf+TKoCc2/+g= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <5oapmjljd378rjvcie0md506ubk1g5324d@4ax.com> Bytes: 5085 On 12/25/2024 8:12 PM, John B. wrote: > On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 19:13:18 -0500, Frank Krygowski > <frkrygow@gXXmail.com> wrote: > >> On 12/25/2024 3:25 PM, AMuzi wrote: >>> On 12/25/2024 1:26 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >>>> On 12/25/2024 4:53 AM, John B. wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I've mentioned numerous times that my family had guns in the house for >>>>> 3 generations with no one being shoot. But reality apparently has no >>>>> bearing on what some people want to be true. >>>> >>>> I think there's no way to logically converse with people who think one >>>> or two anecdotes are more valid than reams of carefully gathered data. >>>> >>>> So much for science! >>>> >>> >>> For actual numbers: >>> >>> 400 million civilian firearms with just under 20,000 firearm homicides >>> per year, one per 20,000 firearms. >>> >>> https://usafacts.org/data-projects/firearms-suicides >>> >>> About 100 million bicycles >>> >>> https://electronwheel.com/bike-facts-and-statistics/ >>> >>> for about 1300 deaths, one per 73,528 bicycles >>> >>> >>> https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/home-and-community/safety-topics/bicycle- >>> deaths/ >>> >>> Which is a lower rate, only 27% of the likelihood of death per bicycle >>> as per firearm. >>> >>> 283,400,986 autos and light trucks in USA >>> >>> https://www.consumeraffairs.com/automotive/how-many-cars-are-in-the-us.html >>> >>> with 44,534 auto/ light truck deaths, one per 6363 vehicles. >>> >>> https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/accidental-injury.htm >>> >>> That's over 3x (3.14) more dangerous per vehicle as per firearm. >>> >>> >>> For an anecdote, all four of my firearms have been oiled and cased, >>> undisturbed in any way, for well over a month. Not one of them has >>> jumped up and wrought mayhem. Not even a little bit. >> >> Nice try, Andrew, but that's a thorough and elaborate attempt at >> distraction. >> >> The issue specifically being discussed is whether there's more risk of >> being shot - or killed by gunshot - when there is a gun in the house, >> versus no gun in the house. >> >> The data is clear, and not even close. Even accounting for differences >> in neighborhood climate (or comparing houses that are both in the same >> sorts of neighborhoods) if you have a gun in the house, it's more likely >> that people will be harmed or killed by that gun. >> >> Of course there are houses with guns that have not had that experience. >> Just as there are people who smoked and did not die of lung cancer. >> Nobody is claiming 100% of guns cause death, nor that 100% of gun owner >> households have gun deaths. The evidence is that the risk is over twice >> as high in those households, not 100%. >> >> Citing bicycle crashes, car crashes, or any other source of harm are >> attempts at distraction. > > > Ah yes but ignoring reality is equally as fault.Example, according to > FBI data Blacks (forgive the description as I'm not up to date on the > current politically correct term) who comprise something like 13% of > the U.S. population commit more then 50% of homicides in the U.S. > Do you suppose that a study made in a site with a large percent of > Black residents might, just possible, be a tiny bit different then a > site with fewer, or even no, Blacks? Again (and again!) at least one of the papers I cited compared households that were as similar as possible, _except_ for guns. And anyway, what do you think we should do about blacks? Pretend they're a different species, so they don't count? -- - Frank Krygowski