Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 07:09:46 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <vkljrp$3fm9s$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vkjmdg$30kff$1@dont-email.me>
 <1814c96a2531ed89$71164$2566989$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <20241226105710.000038df@gmail.com> <vkkf9o$34s2m$2@dont-email.me>
 <lt6bl6F1qduU2@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 08:09:50 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="69c6547b434d322c457906206b19928e";
	logging-data="3660092"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/bL4hJgbwkpnEdErUzkCjJ"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jn7vdb0Ub/zBKhVt+WiGwxTjAqM=
Bytes: 1823

On 2024-12-27, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 20:45:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> So, is it an actual “clone” of the Photoshop UI or not? If it is
>> identical to the Photoshop UI, then it would be just as “clunky and
>> awkward” as Photoshop.
>
> I've never used PhotoShop but I consider GIMP an excellent example of how 
> not to do it. The latest I have is 2.10 on Debian; I don't know if 3 is 
> any better.

I kind of look at PhotoShop the same way. Last I tried it, though, was 
several versions ago. I have almost zero use for either.

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien