Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 23:34:28 +0000
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <vkndi4$3smr2$7@dont-email.me>
References: <o4ucnYo2YLqmZ876nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <slrnvm15rf.3j65k.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com>
 <308f34aa-6ce1-f0d0-a31d-7ff5d389237a@example.net>
 <lse763F5ikfU4@mid.individual.net>
 <c5ddad41-242f-03c6-e007-09d2a77f27e5@example.net>
 <lsh3u3Fk1n1U1@mid.individual.net>
 <e7e50d51-84ec-763c-803a-d422441459f0@example.net>
 <vk1hk7$2ub3j$1@dont-email.me>
 <cd557b3d-dbf6-d332-e80d-9726d48611fb@example.net>
 <lsk40rF3kioU6@mid.individual.net>
 <17951ff3-9385-90a5-d3b9-406e9a550b23@example.net>
 <b_6cnQV_MLwE-Pv6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <14f2a483-1cba-a906-b67d-b8fdd8dd54c4@example.net>
 <lsoq99FqfauU8@mid.individual.net>
 <40ce75cf-2d39-ddec-ea23-3fb18d930683@example.net>
 <5WX9P.39822$Uup4.31269@fx10.iad>
 <1506f21b-8b67-0ddd-b5fc-028b4fd5d99b@example.net>
 <lsrro0Fbig0U2@mid.individual.net>
 <7696e803-859a-ba0e-149e-6a1ffda8acf0@example.net>
 <lsu2r3Fmc4tU4@mid.individual.net> <vkmeia$3kusr$6@dont-email.me>
 <db1c831f-3e86-3be1-dc80-f3040a18eece@example.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 00:34:28 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="84da9f0de8a363e33208d6904f57ef9c";
	logging-data="4086626"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19J4XSU90IPI5z4A0XEGW6cYFG/17w0Ugg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1rJmmdYpVWfftj+EqDzbcl97qd0=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <db1c831f-3e86-3be1-dc80-f3040a18eece@example.net>
Bytes: 2977

On 27/12/2024 23:13, D wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 27 Dec 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>
> I agree with all of this. I think if you cannot be bothered, a low cost 
> index fund is a good choice.
> 
>> -  aim for about 20% ROI and be happy when you get ten.
> 
> Wow! My aim is to not lose money, and anynthing above that is extra on 
> top! ;)

https://www.trustnet.com/fund/price-performance/o/ia-unit-trusts-and-oeics?norisk=true&sortby=P11GBP_D_60M&sortorder=desc&PageSize=25

Pick a fund with good 1,3 and 5 year performance and then look into it 
and check it has the same fund manager.

Ones with more stars are held to be less risky.

Then do a little more research into what they invest in.

Use your judgement and review every 6 months, sell the losers and double 
down on the winners


-- 
All political activity makes complete sense once the proposition that 
all government is basically a self-legalising protection racket, is 
fully understood.