Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <vkp9v6$dofu$1@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vkp9v6$dofu$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article 
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 17:45:26 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <vkp9v6$dofu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vj9s4i$11a3p$1@dont-email.me>
 <vjam6d$1700v$1@dont-email.me> <vjc65g$1i9vk$3@dont-email.me>
 <vjf7kl$2s7e5$1@dont-email.me> <vjfmq3$2upa9$3@dont-email.me>
 <c6b624cb0b1b55d54aab969ee5b4e283ec7be3cd@i2pn2.org>
 <vjhp8b$3gjbv$1@dont-email.me>
 <dc9e7638be92c4d158f238f8c042c8559cd46521@i2pn2.org>
 <vjjg6p$3tvsg$1@dont-email.me>
 <c31edc62508876748c8cf69f93ab80c0a7fd84ac@i2pn2.org>
 <vjka3b$1tms$3@dont-email.me>
 <e11a34c507a23732d83e3d0fcde7b609cdaf3ade@i2pn2.org>
 <vjmse3$k2go$2@dont-email.me>
 <069069bf23698c157ddfd9b62b9b2f632b484c40@i2pn2.org>
 <vjooeq$11n0g$2@dont-email.me>
 <2d3620a6e2a8a57d9db7a33c9d476fe03cac455b@i2pn2.org>
 <vjrfcc$1m1b2$1@dont-email.me>
 <75921cc1f17cdb691969a99e666f237cd09c0b09@i2pn2.org>
 <vjsrp1$1tqvv$2@dont-email.me>
 <25729298b142c60d5b245231984119d42d4ac089@i2pn2.org>
 <vko14j$53b6$3@dont-email.me> <vko1vp$5mmo$1@dont-email.me>
 <vkovk1$b7ki$1@dont-email.me>
 <6d1eddd3fbf2b84297a25a283466799eef07cb3f@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 17:45:27 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e36a69b41f434935b6f127ce88ecad5c";
	logging-data="451070"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+8JVgmoTmjwqJo2OYYELt9BPfMVVK8sKo="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hlMp/60D87aenaLi+JY8u6WrDT0=
In-Reply-To: <6d1eddd3fbf2b84297a25a283466799eef07cb3f@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2409

On 28.12.2024 15:15, Richard Damon wrote:
> doing an INFIITE union (which a union of all FISONs would be) can 
> result in something different in type then the union of a finite number 
> of FISONs.

Every FISON covers less than half of all natural numbers. That implies 
that all FISONs and the union of all FISONs cover less than half of all 
natural numbers.

Regards, WM