Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: ABC settles "rape" claim re: Pres. Elect.
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 12:14:19 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 132
Message-ID: <vkpblc$e422$1@dont-email.me>
References: <4ubgmjdmd8rdfictqu5il3pg60ns81746b@4ax.com>
 <vk9lf2$nssq$4@dont-email.me> <4klimjdulc9vbb00lkgjmdkqdml2ahork9@4ax.com>
 <vkc49q$19n3s$2@dont-email.me> <gnalmjhejoulcnj1snqjhl03gn8hclqacg@4ax.com>
 <vkf6s7$210ao$4@dont-email.me> <hgcomjtn00pi56iepht8unlmo5uqm148f5@4ax.com>
 <vkhfhr$2fvsk$2@dont-email.me> <8qsqmjlikhmjfivakeo7csm9qvnts2ausu@4ax.com>
 <vkk2dv$32is4$2@dont-email.me> <0cmtmjpqqm98ohk459r9dss91ndh0ue3c6@4ax.com>
 <vkmq1h$3o92c$1@dont-email.me> <ek50nj164eb5fomfb019sqhknsu77scnc4@4ax.com>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 18:14:21 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d983243ce1765e9d57f7e7545363e95c";
	logging-data="462914"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19M256CIu+NBjT/gcHw6I6h65UBF2DmisE="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oETOeIcrLujkKGL4EusnEjTpZeA=
In-Reply-To: <ek50nj164eb5fomfb019sqhknsu77scnc4@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 7274

On 12/28/2024 10:18 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 13:01:18 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 12/27/2024 11:46 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 12:06:05 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/26/2024 10:17 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 12:31:38 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/25/2024 11:26 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 15:51:18 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/24/2024 7:37 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 11:48:57 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/23/2024 7:25 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 13:23:29 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/22/2024 10:27 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:43:29 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/21/2024 10:19 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:12:54 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/20/2024 7:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:42:58 -0500, shawn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:53:45 -0500, EGK <memyself@null.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 07:31:32 -0500, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:31:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2024 4:28 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:57:19 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your President-elect forcibly finger fucked her.  Explain *that* fact.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump was not convicted of rape.  ABC said he was.  They lied.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> End of story.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other jurisdictions it's considered rape/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But he wasn't in other jurisdictions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The harm to Donald Trump wws nominal. not $15 million worth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ABC obviously felt otherwise given that they caved so quickly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They didnt want to go through discovery and be exposed as the biased
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> organization most of the media is.  ABC producers warned Stephanopolous not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use the term "rape" and he just thumbed his nose at them and did it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repeatedly anyway.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2024/12/18/media/abc-parent-disney-didnt-think-it-would-beat-trump-in-court-report/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He could still likely have gotten away with it if he had said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something like "I think he's guilty of rape" while still giving the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> official legal facts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's not forget he was verbally attacking a rape victim during the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interview.  Way to go Boy George.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, he was verbally (albeit indirectly) attacking a rapist.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you see the interview?  He was extremely aggressive towards her.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Disgraceful behavior.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree.  He was extremely aggressive towards her disgraceful behavior.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What disgraceful bbehavior did she exhibit?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> She stonewalled his question by chanting a baseless accusation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What "baseless accusation"?
>>>>>>>>>>> You have this completely backwards.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Well, "backwards" is certainly what she was going for.  She tried to
>>>>>>>>>> turn his question ("How can a rapee support a rapist?") into shaming
>>>>>>>>>> raped women for their "political choices".  I can't even begin...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Look at you blaming the (literal) victim.
>>>>>>>>> You're pathetic.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, you parrot her faithfully.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your evasion is noted and is your admission that you've lost the
>>>>>>> discussion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I had nickel for every self-declared "victor"...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You make a claim and are completely unable to either defend it or have
>>>>> a reasonable explanation for your position.  This is the very
>>>>> definition of "loss".  You did it to yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Deal with it.
>>>>
>>>> Okay... what did I blame on a "literal victim"?  What did George?  Think
>>>> carefully, now...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps you need to review the video of the interview before
>>> commenting further.  Agressively interviewing a rape victim using a
>>> false claim as the basis of the discussion is "blaming the victim".
>>
>> No, it isn't.  Hint: notice how you can't answer either question.
>>
> 
> The question has been answered multiple times.  Your inability to
> address facts does not change this.

"The question" was two questions.  And you've answered neither.