Path: ...!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: We have a new standard!
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 08:34:32 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <vktie8$1hdhg$1@dont-email.me>
References: <C++-20241227154547@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
 <cone.1735354270.316807.177566.1000@ripper.email-scan.com>
 <vkojb7$96o6$1@dont-email.me> <vkp50p$ce10$1@dont-email.me>
 <vkr4ve$sksr$1@dont-email.me> <vkrk4l$10d4e$1@dont-email.me>
 <vkrsl3$12f53$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 08:34:34 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="60c17b8524eb9cbd07a8161a28a5c214";
	logging-data="1619504"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19axaFu0n7Fm941/lxI7EKoaCwpSbhP8ks="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XjwcGDZc73zy+8jAeNezCea9EUE=
In-Reply-To: <vkrsl3$12f53$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2441

On 29/12/2024 17:16, Muttley@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 14:51:17 +0100
> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> gabbled:
>> But what you don't get to do - or at least, don't get to do if you 
>> want to be viewed seriously - is spout an /uninformed/ opinion.  
>> That's no more than mindless prejudice, and of no interest to anyone.
> 
> Ah ok , its the usual "anyone who disagrees with me POV is ignorant" 
> position
> is it?
> 

It's not a matter of agreement or disagreement.  You know - by your own 
admission - /nothing/ about C++23.  Your ignorance is not a matter of 
opinion but a matter of fact.

I'm not disagreeing about your /opinions/ of C++23 - I am simply stating 
that any opinions you have, until you have learned at least a little 
about the new standard, are totally worthless.

Maybe once you have gone away and learned a little, we can talk about 
the new features of C++23, and agree or disagree about particulars or 
general aspects of it.  Until then, you might like to note that I 
haven't as yet offered any opinions about C++23 at all - so how could 
you possibly think I disagree with you?