Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vku21r$1kbjn$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: boltar@caprica.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: We have a new standard!
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 12:00:59 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <vku21r$1kbjn$1@dont-email.me>
References: <C++-20241227154547@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <cone.1735354270.316807.177566.1000@ripper.email-scan.com> <vkojb7$96o6$1@dont-email.me> <vkp50p$ce10$1@dont-email.me> <vkr4ve$sksr$1@dont-email.me> <vkrk4l$10d4e$1@dont-email.me> <vkshgh$1799g$1@dont-email.me> <20241230004450.0000202d@yahoo.com> <86seq5bete.fsf@linuxsc.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 13:01:00 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c3b9f94fd8706721b6fc0b6346aac875";
	logging-data="1715831"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18eui6TVRclECjdchKLCtuT"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ISkJBcyZdUHTi7adOlsQ2kUzBhI=
Bytes: 2507

On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 03:17:17 -0800
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wibbled:
>Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>> On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 00:12:31 +0200
>> Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> wrote:
>>
>>> On 29.12.2024 15:51, David Brown wrote:
>>>
>>>> You can have an informed opinion about C++, and agree or disagree
>>>> with the opinions of the committee members.
>>>>
>>>> But what you don't get to do - or at least, don't get to do if you
>>>> want to be viewed seriously - is spout an /uninformed/ opinion.
>>>> That's no more than mindless prejudice, and of no interest to
>>>> anyone.
>>>
>>> Thanks David, for standing against the trolls.  It's a pity that
>>> personal freedoms are often interpreted as "my ignorant opinion has
>>> exactly the same worth as your expert knowledge".
>>>
>>> I'm all for personal freedoms, but my freedoms end where they might
>>> hurt other people, or the nature for that matter.  Boasting ignorant
>>> jumble can easily do that.
>>
>> It seems that Muttley@dastardlyhq.com still didn't figure out why
>> stating strong opinion about something that you not just didn't learn
>> in depth, but didn't even look at casually is less than optimal.
>
>For some time now I have simply stopped reading his comments.
>I don't know why anyone bothers with him for more than a handful
>of interactions.

The same could be said about you.