Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vku21r$1kbjn$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: boltar@caprica.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: We have a new standard! Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 12:00:59 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: <vku21r$1kbjn$1@dont-email.me> References: <C++-20241227154547@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <cone.1735354270.316807.177566.1000@ripper.email-scan.com> <vkojb7$96o6$1@dont-email.me> <vkp50p$ce10$1@dont-email.me> <vkr4ve$sksr$1@dont-email.me> <vkrk4l$10d4e$1@dont-email.me> <vkshgh$1799g$1@dont-email.me> <20241230004450.0000202d@yahoo.com> <86seq5bete.fsf@linuxsc.com> Injection-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 13:01:00 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c3b9f94fd8706721b6fc0b6346aac875"; logging-data="1715831"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18eui6TVRclECjdchKLCtuT" Cancel-Lock: sha1:ISkJBcyZdUHTi7adOlsQ2kUzBhI= Bytes: 2507 On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 03:17:17 -0800 Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wibbled: >Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes: > >> On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 00:12:31 +0200 >> Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> wrote: >> >>> On 29.12.2024 15:51, David Brown wrote: >>> >>>> You can have an informed opinion about C++, and agree or disagree >>>> with the opinions of the committee members. >>>> >>>> But what you don't get to do - or at least, don't get to do if you >>>> want to be viewed seriously - is spout an /uninformed/ opinion. >>>> That's no more than mindless prejudice, and of no interest to >>>> anyone. >>> >>> Thanks David, for standing against the trolls. It's a pity that >>> personal freedoms are often interpreted as "my ignorant opinion has >>> exactly the same worth as your expert knowledge". >>> >>> I'm all for personal freedoms, but my freedoms end where they might >>> hurt other people, or the nature for that matter. Boasting ignorant >>> jumble can easily do that. >> >> It seems that Muttley@dastardlyhq.com still didn't figure out why >> stating strong opinion about something that you not just didn't learn >> in depth, but didn't even look at casually is less than optimal. > >For some time now I have simply stopped reading his comments. >I don't know why anyone bothers with him for more than a handful >of interactions. The same could be said about you.