Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vkucru$1lt2f$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: We have a new standard!
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 16:05:34 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <vkucru$1lt2f$3@dont-email.me>
References: <C++-20241227154547@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
 <cone.1735354270.316807.177566.1000@ripper.email-scan.com>
 <vkojb7$96o6$1@dont-email.me> <vkp50p$ce10$1@dont-email.me>
 <vkr4ve$sksr$1@dont-email.me> <vkrk4l$10d4e$1@dont-email.me>
 <vkshgh$1799g$1@dont-email.me> <86wmfhbexa.fsf@linuxsc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 16:05:34 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="60c17b8524eb9cbd07a8161a28a5c214";
	logging-data="1766479"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+30ewyy3D92qbLQE8rJ43GuSg/8jY3Vk4="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wWtIZ+WT9QthSRPA+iU1WbSBJ5g=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <86wmfhbexa.fsf@linuxsc.com>
Bytes: 2190

On 30/12/2024 12:14, Tim Rentsch wrote:

> Personal opinion:  the comments from David Brown do more harm than
> good here.  At some level he is just a guilty of giving a preachy
> opinion as the person he is responding to.  It seems likely that
> his statements will exacerbate the offending behavior rather than
> diminish it.

Opinion noted.

I disagree that I was giving a "preachy /opinion/", but I can accept 
that my posts were somewhat "preachy" in style.  What influence it may 
have on Muttley (or anyone else giving unjustified opinions on a 
standard they have not looked at) remains to be seen - I don't think 
anyone is in a position to predict accurately.

(I don't always agree with such feedback, but I do always try to give it 
fair consideration.)

Perhaps we can have a more topical discussion about the actual changes 
and new features in C++23?