Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vkutab$net$1@ereborbbs.duckdns.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!ereborbbs.duckdns.org!.POSTED.p4fc72d54.dip0.t-ipconnect.de!not-for-mail From: Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Subject: Re: We're in the top ten! Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 20:46:32 +0100 Organization: Erebor InterNetNews Message-ID: <vkutab$net$1@ereborbbs.duckdns.org> References: <tfr5njd17l3evqfgpkk74o51togj5prd36@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: c3066ed76bae8bcc0e476efb157ff758 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 19:46:19 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: ereborbbs.duckdns.org; posting-host="p4fc72d54.dip0.t-ipconnect.de:79.199.45.84"; logging-data="24029"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ereborbbs.duckdns.org" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <tfr5njd17l3evqfgpkk74o51togj5prd36@4ax.com> Bytes: 2256 Lines: 39 On 12/30/2024 8:12 PM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote: > > Comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action, that is. At least according to the rjk > spoolstats*. But yeah, CSIPGA is now one of the top-ten most active > newsgroups, at least by article count (we're #22 by user count, and > #11 by bytes per day). > > Which really says more about the decline of Usenet** as a whole than > how popular this newsgroup is, although there /has/ been a measured > increase in posts here over the past few years (and this month in > particular, for some reason. Can't imagine why ;-). But six years ago > CSIPGA was #85, so I'm not complaining. > > CSIPGA: it's one of the hot destinations of Usenet again. ;-P > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * find them here. Does not include ALT.* or binaries > http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/spoolstats/allgroups.html > > ** Seriously, the fall-off for Usenet is depressing. According to the > above stats, in the last 7 days, in ALL of the groups monitored, there > were only 949 articles in total and even at the most OPTIMISTIC count, > less than 1000 users who actually post. It almost makes me wish Google > would re-implement their newsfeed again... > > oh, well, good job everyone