| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vkvkdd$1t77e$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: RonO <rokimoto557@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Human testing should have been done for the dairy virus
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 20:20:30 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 169
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <vkvkdd$1t77e$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vkund4$1o5qv$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: rokimoto557@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
logging-data="68377"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:A+yUdn4dUUQWZt+TMvdhJozOEMw=
Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
id 26100229782; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 21:20:43 -0500 (EST)
by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EED78229765
for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 21:20:40 -0500 (EST)
by moderators.individual.net (Exim 4.98)
for talk-origins@moderators.isc.org with esmtps (TLS1.3)
tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
(envelope-from <news@eternal-september.org>)
id 1tSRs4-00000003oN2-0RTT; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 03:20:36 +0100
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4341C5FD66
for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 02:20:31 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: name/4341C5FD66; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
id C2E6FDC01A9; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 03:20:30 +0100 (CET)
X-Injection-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 03:20:30 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <vkund4$1o5qv$1@dont-email.me>
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1/nSlQNsSTa14XzcE79KR4LrEyPZMtBKaQ=
Content-Language: en-US
FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,
HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,
USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.6
smtp.eternal-september.org
On 12/30/2024 12:05 PM, RonO wrote:
> https://www.cbsnews.com/news/leana-wen-bird-flu-testing-h5n1-virus-face-
> the-nation/
>
> I am not the only one that understands what should have been happening
> since day one. The tragic thing is that the CDC never wanted to do the
> right thing.
>
> QUOTE:
> Dr. Leana Wen said Sunday that the lack of testing for bird flu doesn't
> mean that the virus isn't alive in humans, and that she feels the
> federal government "should have learned our lesson from COVID" and
> should be proactive in making tests available for Americans — and not
> wait for labs to characterize the cases and their severity.
>
> "I feel like we should have learned our lesson from COVID, that just
> because we aren't testing doesn't mean the virus isn't there," said Dr.
> Leana Wen, a former Baltimore health commissioner, on "Face the Nation
> with Margaret Brennan."
> END QUOTE:
>
> It should be noted that the CDC was initially for testing for Covid, but
> they screwed up, and instead of adopting working tests that other
> countries had already developed they made their own test that did not
> work. This was a strike against the reliability of testing, and allowed
> the kooks to interfere with the testing and contact tracing that should
> have started early in the Covid Pandemic.
>
> The CDC had a similar excuse for not starting testing and contact
> tracing with the Dairy virus. Their test was unreliable again. It
> consisted of two PCR tests, and one of the tests routinely failed making
> the test results suspect. The CDC had to start assuring the people
> using the test that they could still rely on the one working test, but
> that they needed to verify the testing results with more testing. It
> took the CDC months to fix this defect because they blamed the company
> that they had contracted to make the tests, and wanted the company to
> fix the mess. They wasted months in squabbles with that company when
> all they needed to do was get another company to make a functional test.
> So for around the first 5 months of the dairy epidemic we did not have
> a fully reliable test for the virus.
>
> The CDC refused to start a dairy worker testing program even though they
> knew that the dairy workers were being infected from the first cases in
> Texas. They wanted to deny that worker infections were significant even
> when poultry farms started to go down and it was very unlikely that they
> have had contact with anything but dairy workers. The initial surveys
> in Michigan and Texas found out that over 20 percent of workers on
> infected dairies worked on other farms and that 7% of them also worked
> on poultry farms.
>
> Back in early November when it was found that 7 to 10% of dairy workers
> had likely been infected in Colorado and Michigan by testing for
> antibodies the CDC finally claimed that they were going to start a
> worker testing program in order to detect the infected and give them
> antivirals to reduce the virus production in them and reduce the chance
> of the virus mutating. Nothing has come of that claim and no results
> have been put out for what the CDC actually ended up doing, which seems
> to be nothing. It has been 2 months of nothing.
>
> It looks like we have been very lucky with the dairy virus H5N1 genotype
> B3.13. It seems to have a limited infection range in terms of tissue.
> It can infect the gut, mammary glands and apparently tear ducts, but it
> is not a respiratory infection. The mutations to better infect humans
> do not seem to be selected for among virus infecting those tissues. If
> we had been dealing with genotype D1.1 that has infected two humams (one
> in British Columbia and the other in Louisiana) we would likely already
> be dealing with a tragically severe pandemic. D1.1 does infect
> respiratory tissue, and the mutations needed to better infect humans
> have occurred in both human cases making these patients severely ill.
> This indicates that the mutations needed to make it a pandemic virus
> commonly occur, and can be selected for in the certain tissues that the
> virus propagates in. The teenager in Canada was in critical condition
> at one point, and the Lousiana patient is in the ICU. In both cases the
> wild bird virus did not have the needed mutations, but they likely
> occurred during the infection of both patients. So it looks like the
> CDC's ass has been saved by the biology of the dairy virus. My guess is
> that the mutations that we worry about are selected against in the human
> and cattle tissues that the Dairy virus can infect at this time.
>
> This should not absolve the CDC and USDA from not dealing with the dairy
> epidemic as it should have been dealt with. The USDA should have been
> testing all the dairies from day one. They likely would have prevented
> many herd infections and many fewer poultry flocks would have gone down
> with the dairy virus, and most importantly many fewer dairy and poultry
> workers would have been infected.
>
> https://www.michiganfarmnews.com/usda-releases-findings-of-
> investigation-into-hpai-spread-in-michigan
>
> This was a June news release.
>
> QUOTE:
> So how did it spread?
> Apart from the potential for resident wild birds or peri-domestic
> species to move and transmit the virus, APHIS reported that the only
> other potential transmission routes found from dairy herds to the
> poultry flocks were through shared employment, housing, or movement of
> employees.
>
> Investigators found that approximately 22 employees of three poultry
> flocks worked weekend shifts at two different dairy premises. Shared
> housing between dairy and poultry workers was also identified between
> three poultry premises and two dairy premises, with APHIS noting that
> dairy and poultry employees have social contact too.
> END QUOTE:
>
> QUOTE:
> According to APHIS, key findings identified to date and potential risk
> factors for local transmission included:
>
> Shared personnel between premises
> 20% of affected dairies’ employees and 7% of dairies’ employees family
> members work on other dairy premises
> END QUOTE:
>
> This is why I came up with my estimate that infection of 5% dairy worker
> could account for the spread of the virus to states that did not get
> cattle and to poultry farms that obviously could not have cattle contact.
>
> I was agitating the USDA that dairy workers were taking the virus to
> poultry farms before I retired in May. The USDA verified that this was
> the case by June, but still did nothing to try to prevent further
> poultry flock infections.
>
> Back in June the USDA and CDC understood that dairy workers were taking
> the virus to other dairies and poultry farms, but never started testing
> all the dairies, nor testing dairy workers.
>
> California confirmed this mode of spread by their contact tracing, and
> they still did not do what should have been done. Instead of
> quarantining dairy workers to one farm they allowed voluntary
> restrictions that obviously did not work.
>
> 3 infected poultry workers migrated from Washington to Oregon and were
> identified, confirmed to be infected, and sent back to Washington, but
> infected workers have been going to other states from the start of the
> infection. There has been no restrictions on their movements because
> the USDA and CDC refuse to identify all the infected herds, nor test the
> workers, so they don't even know which workers have to have their
> movements restricted.
>
> Ron Okimoto
https://www.the-independent.com/news/health/california-cows-bird-flu-virus-b2671647.html
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/avian-influenza-bird-flu/more-avian-flu-confirmed-us-dairy-cattle-and-poultry-flocks-arizona
71% of the dairy herds in California have been infected by the dairy virus.
Over 16 million birds have had to be killed due to infected poultry
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========