Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Joel gets a taste of reality
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2025 15:22:20 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <vl4inc$300nq$1@dont-email.me>
References: <pbabnj15ufgdneckrlhljlflero912c7mq@4ax.com>
 <vl4ahf$2t5hj$1@dont-email.me> <pjebnj9508jog9pn4s6s3hfmpbrenj7q88@4ax.com>
 <vl4en9$2vaoc$1@dont-email.me> <grgbnjlun6jo7vtj6tl2rjruurr2l5qo5e@4ax.com>
 <vl4hcu$2vn1u$1@dont-email.me> <kmibnjdvd39rl91349b4iuda58daaeev8i@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 00:22:20 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="217adbfdabb1b3df5048e056bb46a984";
	logging-data="3146490"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19dwhelzZA+/RniEKC+fZ0G8VVu5dUOU7E="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rMEtCM/WDcPO/b/nZ+ujE5FTfd4=
Content-Language: en-CA
In-Reply-To: <kmibnjdvd39rl91349b4iuda58daaeev8i@4ax.com>
Bytes: 2702

On 2025-01-01 15:10, Joel wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> 
>>>>>> So to exactly what "punch" did Samsung beat Apple?
>>>>>
>>>>> I screwed up, actually, this phone isn't imitating Samsung.
>>>>
>>>> Fixed the subject for you.
>>>
>>> And yet, if I had first examined the article correctly, it would make
>>> Apple showing *progress*, which is kind of funny since your defense is
>>> that *I* was wrong, just some guy online who can wrap my mind around
>>> why Apple does it the way it does.  I mean, not in the sense of
>>> agreement, but in the sense of seeing that they are OK with being
>>> weird.
>>
>> "It would MAKE Apple showing progress"?
> 
> 
> "It would mean that Apple was showing progress" is what I should have
> edited it to say.

In what way would it mean that Apple was showing progress?

Literally, all there is in the article is a rumour that Apple will be 
changing the NAME they use for a product.

> 
> 
>> I'm not going to bother with the rest of your gibberish.
>>
>> Dude, try again, but this time in English.
> 
> 
> Oh gibberish, huh, unlike Apple's UI, heh.  That's a great descriptor
> for it, malformed functions, inferior, and yet the Apple name sells
> these devices.
What function(s) in Apple's is/(are) "malformed"?

When you've put yourself in a huge hole...

....stop digging.