Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary, effectively)
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 12:35:26 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <vl5tlu$39tut$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>
 <bce1b27d-170c-4385-8938-36805c983c49@att.net> <vk693m$f52$2@dont-email.me>
 <a17eb8b6-7d11-4c59-b98c-b4d5de8358ca@att.net> <vk7dmb$7mh2$2@dont-email.me>
 <b72490c1-e61a-4c23-a3a5-f624b2c084e4@att.net> <vk8tbq$j9h1$1@dont-email.me>
 <bd7dfdc7-6471-4fe6-b078-0ca739031580@att.net> <vklumc$3htmt$1@dont-email.me>
 <c03cf79d-0572-4b19-ad92-a0d12df53db9@att.net>
 <n9CdnR02SsevtPL6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <45a632ed-26cc-4730-a8dd-1e504d6df549@att.net> <vkpa98$dofu$2@dont-email.me>
 <3d2fe306aa299bc78e94c14dadd21645d8db9829@i2pn2.org>
 <vkr8sq$t59a$2@dont-email.me>
 <d4669f26483b01c8a43dfd3ac4b61ab4a42bf551@i2pn2.org>
 <vksikk$17fjt$1@dont-email.me>
 <aa2941e93e806f1dda55d563dd062db67eb879f1@i2pn2.org>
 <vktmi3$1ia1u$1@dont-email.me>
 <c46775b30460bc564b3fe7bd1b838713829024f8@i2pn2.org>
 <vkv3t1$1qb93$1@dont-email.me>
 <2163aa0c0efba66c813e8ebda5ef5ece6d19ea34@i2pn2.org>
 <vl1bp4$2bcos$2@dont-email.me> <2f57d42a-2623-47fe-921c-87e6b288db95@att.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 12:35:26 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a3e4916d82901f495981bca5b3dfcc34";
	logging-data="3471325"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18b4yGcfplgWnJcWT8bMPolvcUlb1US0SM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3cmjidUT1C8b5IY8m/bCinV4WIk=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <2f57d42a-2623-47fe-921c-87e6b288db95@att.net>
Bytes: 2821

On 01.01.2025 01:45, Jim Burns wrote:
> On 12/31/2024 1:05 PM, WM wrote:
>> On 31.12.2024 16:37, Richard Damon wrote:
> 
>>> [...]
>>
>> I don't stop
>> but know that
>> every FISON is finite as its name says
>> and covers at most 1 % of ℕ.
>> If you don't agree
>> find a counterexample.
> 
> No FISON is smaller than 1% of the maximum FISON.

{1} is smaller than {101} which is smaller than all larger FISONs.

> Each FISON is a counter.example --
> NOT because any of them is larger, but
> because no maximum FISON exists, darkᵂᴹ or visibleᵂᴹ.

Maximum FISONs cannot be grasped because they are potentially infinite. 
But all are smaller than 1 % of ℕ because finity is smaller than 
infinity by at least 1 %.

Regards, WM