Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary, effectively)
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 18:40:45 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <vl97eu$3vk27$6@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>
 <n9CdnR02SsevtPL6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <45a632ed-26cc-4730-a8dd-1e504d6df549@att.net> <vkpa98$dofu$2@dont-email.me>
 <3d2fe306aa299bc78e94c14dadd21645d8db9829@i2pn2.org>
 <vkr8sq$t59a$2@dont-email.me>
 <d4669f26483b01c8a43dfd3ac4b61ab4a42bf551@i2pn2.org>
 <vksikk$17fjt$1@dont-email.me>
 <aa2941e93e806f1dda55d563dd062db67eb879f1@i2pn2.org>
 <vktmi3$1ia1u$1@dont-email.me>
 <c46775b30460bc564b3fe7bd1b838713829024f8@i2pn2.org>
 <vkv3t1$1qb93$1@dont-email.me>
 <2163aa0c0efba66c813e8ebda5ef5ece6d19ea34@i2pn2.org>
 <vl1901$2b0qi$1@dont-email.me>
 <4441753d454842cfa2efde51b362ca5d36937a48@i2pn2.org>
 <vl5toq$39tut$3@dont-email.me> <vl64q8$3c170$1@dont-email.me>
 <vl6ig1$3ecap$4@dont-email.me>
 <2a9ace418f6cb97706e63eb54ed6ad773a09a36a@i2pn2.org>
 <vl88m6$3qtjc$3@dont-email.me>
 <370747c3f34e9ee5e26b0a42ac9d54346a402472@i2pn2.org>
 <vl95ag$3vk28$3@dont-email.me>
 <a3e5c2fa50713996265a81fd7788f3419ffbb78e@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 18:40:46 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="01d51636a443c1100d6c37c2b77ce98b";
	logging-data="4182087"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX192HHYimF4v/gAFIecyy4I/T4YTYCU/FZk="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fWdzfGYBDjVXKghotxSf74v/pQ0=
In-Reply-To: <a3e5c2fa50713996265a81fd7788f3419ffbb78e@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2628

On 03.01.2025 18:20, joes wrote:
> Am Fri, 03 Jan 2025 18:04:16 +0100 schrieb WM:
>> On 03.01.2025 13:26, joes wrote:
>>> Am Fri, 03 Jan 2025 09:55:34 +0100 schrieb WM:
>>
>>>>> WHich is a property of the set, but not the individual members.
>>>> A property of its members.
>>> Fuck no. The size of {1, 2, 4} is not a member.
>> There are three elements. That is the property of the elements.
> No, the elements are numbers, none of which has size 3.
> 
A property of three elements is that they are three elements. No set 
construction is required to support that.

Regards, WM