Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary, effectively)
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 13:45:33 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <vl9lpu$3796$4@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>
 <n9CdnR02SsevtPL6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <45a632ed-26cc-4730-a8dd-1e504d6df549@att.net> <vkpa98$dofu$2@dont-email.me>
 <3d2fe306aa299bc78e94c14dadd21645d8db9829@i2pn2.org>
 <vkr8sq$t59a$2@dont-email.me>
 <d4669f26483b01c8a43dfd3ac4b61ab4a42bf551@i2pn2.org>
 <vksikk$17fjt$1@dont-email.me>
 <aa2941e93e806f1dda55d563dd062db67eb879f1@i2pn2.org>
 <vktmi3$1ia1u$1@dont-email.me>
 <c46775b30460bc564b3fe7bd1b838713829024f8@i2pn2.org>
 <vkv3t1$1qb93$1@dont-email.me>
 <2163aa0c0efba66c813e8ebda5ef5ece6d19ea34@i2pn2.org>
 <vl1bp4$2bcos$2@dont-email.me>
 <ac6061d7f9963a83c7a67f474fe9cb835c98cf5b@i2pn2.org>
 <vl5tvs$39tus$1@dont-email.me>
 <9387e323873e24f0a57b8daa49579d9a1c517563@i2pn2.org>
 <vl6i2u$3ecap$2@dont-email.me>
 <89598d353b5737d5cbfabd1cde31c797a212e13d@i2pn2.org>
 <vl7f50$3jdl8$2@dont-email.me> <vl7ftq$3jcou$2@dont-email.me>
 <vl88fp$3qtjc$2@dont-email.me>
 <7595ac4af886b0ab3c0f5fe6bcbcbce6103e78aa@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 22:45:35 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e94d1704a333ab297c4ae0db56ab3864";
	logging-data="105766"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+PpxnzCW2YXEu6IjGwSaJkYlzONoswxI0="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oMaeXZSz+4Q6jzHn8ZFmdy8sbxA=
In-Reply-To: <7595ac4af886b0ab3c0f5fe6bcbcbce6103e78aa@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2645

On 1/3/2025 6:50 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 1/3/25 3:52 AM, WM wrote:
>> On 03.01.2025 02:52, Moebius wrote:
>>
>>> Nope. For each and every FISON F: F c IN.
>>>
>>> But UNION(Set_of_FISONs) = IN.
>>
>> Every union of FISONs including them all which stay below a certain 
>> threshold stays below that threshold.
>>
>> Regards, WM
>>
> 
> Which is different from *ALL* of them, which =your logic can't do, and 
> thus shows you are just a stupid idiot that just doesn't understand the 
> infinite.

Yet he teaches? wow.