| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vlbt3g$ic6h$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Suspension losses Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 13:02:24 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 71 Message-ID: <vlbt3g$ic6h$2@dont-email.me> References: <vl3spg$2s1te$1@dont-email.me> <ltncirFoe27U1@mid.individual.net> <vl64mj$3bq6b$2@dont-email.me> <vl6c56$3dbnt$1@dont-email.me> <vl6dhg$3d8lq$1@dont-email.me> <vl6hn5$3edb4$1@dont-email.me> <jaehnj5vhmdv672avehfcrfaurqm6rl80c@4ax.com> Reply-To: frkrygow@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 19:02:28 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="af79d49f9a8c903c124bd124c310fd0e"; logging-data="602321"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18dRWkLuOrZvCx5e53dc26KlmDKIL50+tc=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:fbqp0RXl4DSDZgLEyvHz6QX79yI= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <jaehnj5vhmdv672avehfcrfaurqm6rl80c@4ax.com> Bytes: 4606 On 1/3/2025 11:46 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 12:17:22 -0500, Frank Krygowski > <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >>>> A pair of series RLC circuits (one for the road-tire interface >>>> and a second for the suspension-rider interface) would be a good >>>> start. I'm not skilled enough to do the calculations, but others >>>> on this group likely are. >> >> I _may_ have been able to do such calculations 50 years ago, but I'm not >> sure. I certainly can't do them now. > > Actually, the analogy between a mechanical system and RLC (resistance, > inductance and cazapitance) calculations are fairly simple. For > example: > > "Mechanical-electrical analogies" > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanical%E2%80%93electrical_analogies> > > "Electrical Analogies of Mechanical Systems" > <https://www.tutorialspoint.com/control_systems/control_systems_electrical_analogies_mechanical.htm> > > "RLC circuit: Analogy with mechanical systems." (From Brazil) > <https://proceedings.sbmac.org.br/sbmac/article/download/134486/3384/0> I'm pretty familiar with the RLC analogy to mechanical vibrations. Actually, I remember sitting in a Vibrations class taught by my least favorite professor on the day he brought in a large, demonstration-sized Analog Computer (Remember those?) to model something we had been calculating. To the amusement of the students, he was not able to get the thing to work properly. > >>>> The hardest part is apt to be finding >>>> an equivalent circuit for the rider, who isn't a rigid mass but >>>> rather a dissipative blob....8-) > > If you're going to build a computer simulation, there are cut-n-paste > mechanical models of various human bodies available. > > "A mechanical model to determine the influence of masses and mass > distribution on the impact force during running" > <https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10653036/> > "Simple spring-damper-mass models have been widely used to simulate > human locomotion. However, most previous models have not accounted for > the effect of non-rigid masses (wobbling masses) on impact forces." > > Ok, a running model is not going to work well on a bicycle. So, look > around for something that's a better fit. I'll admit that I've never > done anything like this, but I can see how it might be possible to > model a wobbling blob on a bicycle. > > Also, modeling is NOT the hardest part of the problem. In my never > humble opinion, the most difficult part is dealing with the large > number of significant figured necessary to maintain accuracy. I human > or bicycle model might work accurate to maybe 1/10th of a watt, while > the power produced by a road bump powered energy harvesting system > might be on the order of fractions of a milliwatt. This forces the > human model to be accurate well beyond reasonable limits. My idea wasn't to model a human body for computation purposes, although others are probably interested in doing that. I'm thinking more of coming up with a physical device, perhaps for weighting a tire during a rolling drum test, so the test would more accurately reflect behavior of tires when ridden by a human pedaling a bicycle. Maybe 75 pounds of raw meat? -- - Frank Krygowski