Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Moebius <invalid@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary, effectively)
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 22:00:20 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <vlc7h4$k8mj$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>
 <b72490c1-e61a-4c23-a3a5-f624b2c084e4@att.net> <vk8tbq$j9h1$1@dont-email.me>
 <bd7dfdc7-6471-4fe6-b078-0ca739031580@att.net> <vklumc$3htmt$1@dont-email.me>
 <c03cf79d-0572-4b19-ad92-a0d12df53db9@att.net>
 <n9CdnR02SsevtPL6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <45a632ed-26cc-4730-a8dd-1e504d6df549@att.net> <vkpa98$dofu$2@dont-email.me>
 <3d2fe306aa299bc78e94c14dadd21645d8db9829@i2pn2.org>
 <vkr8sq$t59a$2@dont-email.me>
 <d4669f26483b01c8a43dfd3ac4b61ab4a42bf551@i2pn2.org>
 <vksikk$17fjt$1@dont-email.me>
 <aa2941e93e806f1dda55d563dd062db67eb879f1@i2pn2.org>
 <vktmi3$1ia1u$1@dont-email.me>
 <c46775b30460bc564b3fe7bd1b838713829024f8@i2pn2.org>
 <vkv3t1$1qb93$1@dont-email.me>
 <2163aa0c0efba66c813e8ebda5ef5ece6d19ea34@i2pn2.org>
 <vl1bp4$2bcos$2@dont-email.me>
 <4d797c9134ea480aa4976cf866cacaede8d309bd@i2pn2.org>
 <vl5uid$3au1p$1@dont-email.me> <vl650i$3c2ia$1@dont-email.me>
 <vl6il4$3ecap$5@dont-email.me> <vl74p8$3hqrd$1@dont-email.me>
 <vlc6m0$k8so$3@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: invalid@example.invalid
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 22:00:21 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0a8499f5dd11b0a7bb8fcf7459401dea";
	logging-data="664275"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/2NcTpOyYOgHndbEpOTznj"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Vbfeiswlhi8eFEpftG4FEXU5il8=
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <vlc6m0$k8so$3@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2393

Am 04.01.2025 um 21:45 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
> On 1/2/2025 2:42 PM, FromTheRafters wrote:
>> WM was thinking very hard :
>>> On 02.01.2025 14:40, FromTheRafters wrote:

>>>> One percent of infinitely many is nonsense.
>>>
>>> [...] But it is not false. (WM)

Indeed! It's NOT EVEN WRONG.

..
..
..