Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vlc9ov$57qa$6@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] Another reason to defund the CBC
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 16:38:38 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <vlc9ov$57qa$6@dont-email.me>
References: <vla470$57qa$1@dont-email.me> <1735963891-1263@newsgrouper.org.uk>
 <vlbpp2$ht05$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 22:38:40 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="64b42719856ba3ead32024d1f5f69f7e";
	logging-data="171850"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19n8ls8AnwSGlcLhQkLSD0puF+XzJuRQUo="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1bWWVnsNxSbl5rjS7WcrqvBO6Z8=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-CA
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 250104-2, 1/4/2025), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <vlbpp2$ht05$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2245

On 2025-01-04 12:05 PM, moviePig wrote:
> On 1/3/2025 11:11 PM, Ed Stasiak wrote:
>>
>>> Rhino
>>>
>>> I have to agree with his opinion that when 97% of the CBC executives -
>>> and they gave a staggering number of executives for their size - get a
>>> hefty bonus, something is truly rotten in the running of that
>>> corporation. The funding for these generous bonuses comes from tax
>>> money. Meanwhile, viewership of CBC programs is not very high either.
>>
>> How much does the cost of CBC work out per Canadian tax payer per year?
>>
>> I've read that for American PBS/NPR, it comes out to something like $0.05
>> per person per year yet IMO, they should still be privatized, as 
>> they're blatantly
>> biased towards the Left/Democrats.
> 
> Seems baked-in that PBS/NPR is, by charter, biased toward the 
> arts ...and therefore toward the Left/Democrats, relatively speaking.
> 
> 
Oh right, because the Left/Democrats are the great intellectuals among 
us and the great unwashed masses are innately suspicious of such content.

-- 
Rhino