Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vlc9ov$57qa$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: [OT] Another reason to defund the CBC Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 16:38:38 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: <vlc9ov$57qa$6@dont-email.me> References: <vla470$57qa$1@dont-email.me> <1735963891-1263@newsgrouper.org.uk> <vlbpp2$ht05$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 22:38:40 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="64b42719856ba3ead32024d1f5f69f7e"; logging-data="171850"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19n8ls8AnwSGlcLhQkLSD0puF+XzJuRQUo=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:1bWWVnsNxSbl5rjS7WcrqvBO6Z8= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Content-Language: en-CA X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 250104-2, 1/4/2025), Outbound message In-Reply-To: <vlbpp2$ht05$2@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2245 On 2025-01-04 12:05 PM, moviePig wrote: > On 1/3/2025 11:11 PM, Ed Stasiak wrote: >> >>> Rhino >>> >>> I have to agree with his opinion that when 97% of the CBC executives - >>> and they gave a staggering number of executives for their size - get a >>> hefty bonus, something is truly rotten in the running of that >>> corporation. The funding for these generous bonuses comes from tax >>> money. Meanwhile, viewership of CBC programs is not very high either. >> >> How much does the cost of CBC work out per Canadian tax payer per year? >> >> I've read that for American PBS/NPR, it comes out to something like $0.05 >> per person per year yet IMO, they should still be privatized, as >> they're blatantly >> biased towards the Left/Democrats. > > Seems baked-in that PBS/NPR is, by charter, biased toward the > arts ...and therefore toward the Left/Democrats, relatively speaking. > > Oh right, because the Left/Democrats are the great intellectuals among us and the great unwashed masses are innately suspicious of such content. -- Rhino