Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vlcs4m$nnc8$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-11,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: The problem with not owning the software
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:52:06 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <vlcs4m$nnc8$3@dont-email.me>
References: <Tn39P.50437$%aWb.4583@fx18.iad>
	<vk5vjq$3v34m$1@toylet.eternal-september.org>
	<nuy9P.28629$aTp4.27488@fx09.iad>
	<vkbuqd$18m92$2@toylet.eternal-september.org>
	<9OCcnRW7grqkbPT6nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@earthlink.com>
	<vkfva1$28j6k$1@toylet.eternal-september.org> <vkhqif$2hvap$1@dont-email.me>
	<vkmd9n$3l76a$4@toylet.eternal-september.org> <vko7up$6qks$2@dont-email.me>
	<ltb26aFov8dU1@mid.individual.net> <fUYbP.143220$bYV2.129957@fx17.iad>
	<vl5vln$3b63u$3@dont-email.me> <vl72j1$3h9eh$7@dont-email.me>
	<vla5qr$5tqv$1@dont-email.me> <vlaelm$au6q$1@dont-email.me>
	<vlcm6h$mvt4$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 03:52:07 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c85702e5c6cceae706a35141fa55e6e0";
	logging-data="777608"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/pF66CWkHjCqSVhON7e4wq"
User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SRj5PMKelPlTDTePSscLwmnk9Qc=
Bytes: 3246

On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 01:10:42 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote:

> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 02:19:07 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote:
>> 
>>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 12:09:28 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>> ... suggests that people don't do much other than open up Word and
>>>>>> Excel.
>>>>> 
>>>>> In the professional world that's pretty accurate.
>>>> 
>>>> Doesn’t sound like that adjective “professional” extends to the actual
>>>> quality of results, then.
>>> 
>>> Based on what, exactly?
>> 
>> Based on the known issues with over-reliance on Microsoft products.
> 
> Such as? Excluding the gene name issue, which is pretty niche.

It’s affecting a whole lot of research work
<https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-016-1044-7>.

Then there was the massive screwup over underreporting of COVID-19
figures in the UK, which went undetected for months
<https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/10/excel-glitch-may-have-caused-uk-to-underreport-covid-19-cases-by-15841/>.

The Austrian Social Democratic Party’s botched election of a new
leader
<https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/06/austria_election_excel_blunder/>.

How many Excel screwups can you commit in just one job?
<https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/12/excel_anesthetist_recruitment_blunder/>.

Is it a good idea for a Formula 1 team to use Excel to manage its
parts inventory?
<https://arstechnica.com/cars/2024/03/formula-1-chief-appalled-to-find-team-using-excel-to-manage-20000-car-parts/>.

There are entire websites devoted to compiling errors caused by using
Microsoft Excel.