Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: OT: WaPo cartoonist resigns
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 11:29:34 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <vlh0de$1mscc$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vlcaup$krni$1@dont-email.me> <vlcc1r$57qa$11@dont-email.me>
 <vlcenh$lccp$3@dont-email.me> <vlcg6r$lv7u$1@dont-email.me>
 <vld020$o45q$3@dont-email.me> <vlffus$1a4je$3@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2025 17:29:35 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5502217a36b3dada914bf3a57f90c0be";
	logging-data="1798540"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Kt2NZDSBGf840leilHeWnYZouMZJ7Izc="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:t5+tK5oOrhSrJLyEDKfc5PpYWeE=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vlffus$1a4je$3@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3327

On 1/5/2025 9:42 PM, Rhino wrote:
> On 2025-01-04 10:58 PM, moviePig wrote:
>> On 1/4/2025 6:28 PM, Rhino wrote:
>>> On 2025-01-04 6:03 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>> On 1/4/2025 5:17 PM, Rhino wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-01-04 4:58 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Read it and weep...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     https://anntelnaes.substack.com/p/why-im-quitting-the- 
>>>>>> washington- post
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't disagree with her basic principle but I wonder how many 
>>>>> times she held Biden and his administration to account? I'll bet 
>>>>> she found reasons to give them a pass....
>>>>
>>>> Alarmingly irrelevant, but here you go:
>>>>
>>> Irrelevant? Hardly! You don't get to cry "hypocrite!" at tech bros 
>>> unless you're free from hypocrisy yourself. Given how the WashPost 
>>> refused to see Biden's mental decline until the June debate despite 
>>> it being obvious to anyone with eyes, I have every right to be 
>>> suspicious of her only being upset now that she can't depict the tech 
>>> bros in a negative light.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/01/19/biden-fantasy- 
>>>> world- ann-telnaes-cartoon/
>>>>
>>>> ...and...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/04/05/ann-telnaes- 
>>>> cartoon- biden-israel/
>>>>
>>>> ...etc.
>>>
>>> Those links would be great if I had a subscription but I don't: I get 
>>> a big subscription window that covers much of the cartoon and doesn't 
>>> let me scroll down to see the caption.
>>
>> They're some of her Biden cartoons.  I arrived at the links via Google 
>> ("telnaes cartoon biden") and encountered no paywall.
>>
>> However, *her* potential bias ("hypocrisy") isn't the issue here.  
>> E.g., she could even be hired as Ultra-Liberal Attack Dog.  What's 
>> disturbing is the Voice From Above (Bezos? Trump?) exerting editorial 
>> censorship.
>>
>>
> As usual, you have a competely wrong-headed attitude here but if you 
> didn't understand my first explanation, you won't understand my second 
> either.

Your "first explanation" is that she should be bipartisan, right?  Why?