Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary, effectively)
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 18:42:45 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <vlh4ml$1nnkl$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vktmi3$1ia1u$1@dont-email.me>
 <c46775b30460bc564b3fe7bd1b838713829024f8@i2pn2.org>
 <vkv3t1$1qb93$1@dont-email.me>
 <2163aa0c0efba66c813e8ebda5ef5ece6d19ea34@i2pn2.org>
 <vl1bp4$2bcos$2@dont-email.me>
 <4d797c9134ea480aa4976cf866cacaede8d309bd@i2pn2.org>
 <vl5uid$3au1p$1@dont-email.me> <vl650i$3c2ia$1@dont-email.me>
 <vl6il4$3ecap$5@dont-email.me>
 <1e8ebc58a12fd659e38d0b9f0ff6fc0194f933be@i2pn2.org>
 <vl88v4$3qtjc$5@dont-email.me>
 <ecf6965f78c9152b3fff0d3b18d7df0247100acf@i2pn2.org>
 <vl9605$3vk27$5@dont-email.me>
 <9a25e92033e0a4d24e9c27df0de95d8b033d0862@i2pn2.org>
 <vlasro$cr0k$1@dont-email.me>
 <a676a0802d5bdf15dd22a1f8cd5072893b6e1e33@i2pn2.org>
 <vldn14$vlah$2@dont-email.me>
 <171d790a8a99fa28e5b849e2726d1c9c0f93d932@i2pn2.org>
 <vlefcq$14esf$7@dont-email.me>
 <51593821cf96cef1e5f8c4d1cf692dc145064429@i2pn2.org>
 <vlenld$1686e$1@dont-email.me> <vlf1nu$17khf$11@dont-email.me>
 <vlf8k2$195g1$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2025 18:42:45 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1858afcca4cf10199f24512bd9be19ae";
	logging-data="1826453"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/d/cFsyDyzrqRWAAYung7a7c5FmicAv7A="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WBO+0Fj4aSlGP4AtmflC7fAxlPw=
In-Reply-To: <vlf8k2$195g1$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2676

On 06.01.2025 01:37, Moebius wrote:
>> On 1/5/2025 11:47 AM, WM wrote:

>>>>>>> What should make the union larger than all FISONs?

So it must appear to fools who cannot answer it.

> A reasonable question might be:
> 
>       "What should make the union larger than each and every FISON?"
> 
> That fact that the union of ALL FISONs "comprises" ALL natural numbers, 
> while each and every FISON only "comprises" finitely many numbers.

That is not a fact but disproven nonsense.
> 
>>>>>>> Every union of FISONs which stay below a certain threshold stays 
>>>>>>> below that threshold.
> 
> Nope.

What makes it larger?

Regards, WM