Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: I take back everything I ever said about Einstein being a
 thieving underhanded liar.
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 13:30:45 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <vlj6lo$26alj$1@dont-email.me>
References: <c2ff03bd9f67c156e4f8efc83814ea4c@www.novabbs.com>
 <6b1e34340d0ce9ffd65921a3250ad5e4@www.novabbs.com>
 <06f6c6465828541b39e4242c877a4c05@www.novabbs.com>
 <ecb2bebfbfb4c02bb206f1bb87a3b794@www.novabbs.com>
 <8312bfe43fe97854ddab449201c0c390@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 13:28:40 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0d92a2a88e5ae2dba404c2dc9a8317b5";
	logging-data="2304691"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/HMsD+SgEolum4mN67mIUF"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PAb8CQ38NeJUXc8ocFTx3n9H+dc=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <8312bfe43fe97854ddab449201c0c390@www.novabbs.com>
Bytes: 2763

Den 06.01.2025 22:38, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
> "RESTATEMENT OF THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE (PE), ALONG WITH A NEW
> THEORY OF GRAVITATION –  WHICH IS NOT BASED ON IT
> 
> Here, we state the correct principle of equivalence, which we would not
> really need as a basis of any new theory. It is a simple derivation
> based on the law of energy conservation broadened to embody the mass &
> energy equivalence of the special theory of relativity.
> 
> The Correct PE: Both gravitation and accelerational motion, in fact any
> force field, alter a given “rest mass”, held at rest, in the same
> manner. It is that the rest mass of the given object, decreases as much
> as the energy necessary to furnish to this object, in order to remove
> it, from the force field.
> 
> This finding, though, leaves unnecessary the use of the analogy between
> acceleration and gravitation, for a subsequent theory of gravitation." -
> Tolga Yarman


You are in a room.
In the middle of the room an accelerometer is hanging in a string
from the ceiling.
You see the accelerometer shows 1 g acceleration towards the ceiling.

Is the room accelerating at 1 g far from the Earth and other
gravitating masses, or is it stationary on the ground?

You will not answer, of course.
You never try to use your own brain to answer a question,
even if it is as simple as this one.

Why don't you?

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/