Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vljc9i$27uoh$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: We have a new standard!
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 14:04:34 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <vljc9i$27uoh$1@dont-email.me>
References: <cone.1735849245.346442.281052.1000@ripper.email-scan.com>
 <vl8m0u$3t4v1$1@dont-email.me>
 <cone.1735909901.753978.294757.1000@ripper.email-scan.com>
 <vl8sfi$3u4fh$1@dont-email.me>
 <cone.1735919451.379621.297354.1000@ripper.email-scan.com>
 <vl9eq7$1n1d$1@dont-email.me>
 <cone.1735956395.711486.303344.1000@ripper.email-scan.com>
 <vlbte2$imdo$1@dont-email.me> <vlg4qr$1hinc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vljasv$27g6v$4@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 15:04:34 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8c5e3bb50f8ae50dc4390f343511cdc4";
	logging-data="2358033"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19sf94ExspeCk5P4uxtxPUM"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FAlH/UX+1xps/a1KpLttBdE4JJU=
Bytes: 2255

On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 08:40:47 -0500
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wibbled:
>Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
>
>> On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:08:00 +0200
>> Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> wibbled:
>>>On 04.01.2025 04:06, Sam wrote:
>>>> void my_algorithm(algorithm_info_t &) throws(AlgoThrownClasses)
>>>
>>>That's the first good idea from you in this discussion. I still do not 
>>>see much point in exception specifications, but such a typedef would at 
>>>least make life easier for me on this Alternate Earth.
>>>
>>>PS. Nowadays they prefer `using` instead of `typedef`.
>>
>> I never understood the point of that. Why not increase the semantic scope
>> of "typedef" instead of having 2 keywords that in a lot of circumstances
>> do the same thing?
>
>Because using is a nicer to read?

Who knows. The C++ committee certainly has form on this - typename replaced 
class in template definitions when they realised 10 years after everyone else
that reusing class in that particular case was somewhat confusing.