Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.spitfire.i.gajendra.net!not-for-mail
From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer
Subject: Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 17:23:01 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID: <vljntl$o9b$2@reader2.panix.com>
References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <vljiml$296n5$1@dont-email.me> <vljjmf$g76$2@reader2.panix.com> <vljmlt$29vt3$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 17:23:01 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader2.panix.com; posting-host="spitfire.i.gajendra.net:166.84.136.80";
	logging-data="24875"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Bytes: 2694
Lines: 53

In article <vljmlt$29vt3$1@dont-email.me>,  <Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org> wrote:
>On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 16:10:55 -0000 (UTC)
>cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) wibbled:
>>In article <vljiml$296n5$1@dont-email.me>,  <Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org> wrote:
>>>On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 15:35:44 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>I think perhaps you should try to write some complex programs in
>>>>the Unix environment before making such categorial statement.
>>>
>>>Don't be patronising.
>>
>>Wow, that's rich coming from you, my guy.
>
>"My guy?" LOL, how old are you, 12? :)
>
>>>I've probably written more unix software in 30 years
>>>than you've had hot dinners including a fully featured telnetd and numerous
>>>other servers for work and play. And in the places I've worked which included
>>>finance/banking, aerospace and government,
>>
>>"For play" implies things that could be, or are, open source.
>>So post a link to code, then.
>
>Nope, I like my relative anonymity here and I don't need to prove anything to
>some twat with a chip on his shoulder getting worked up over technical trivia.

Ok.  So we're just supposed to take your word for it, I guess.
Got it.

>>Bluntly, I don't believe that any of this is true.  Your posts
>
>Believe what you like, I couldn't give a rats arse.

You also have no evidence to back up your claims, it seems.

>>here show a distinct lack of relevant experience and knowledge.
>
>Whatever you say genius.
>
>>*shrug* Feel free to look up some things that I've written, if
>>you like.  Perhaps you'll learn something.
>
>Is this yours?
>
>https://github.com/dancrossnyc

Yup, that's me.

>Am I supposed to be impressed?

*shrug*  I think my credentials speak for themselves.  I really
don't care whether you're impressed or not.

	- Dan C.