| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vlkhtd$2f336$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tony Nance <tnusenet17@gmail.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: The thing about finishing stuff Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 19:46:37 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 54 Message-ID: <vlkhtd$2f336$1@dont-email.me> References: <vl3nqo$kvf$1@reader2.panix.com> <vl52p8$35vj0$1@dont-email.me> <vl6rut$3g6av$1@dont-email.me> <vli8f7$21rm8$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 01:46:38 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6287026c79373fb8ffebb28f8554c24c"; logging-data="2591846"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/3K4sSOzW8YHR6r+3em0DqdsE4nCHFKNo=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:BtWfn2siDR2WeO218rXElP2t2V4= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vli8f7$21rm8$2@dont-email.me> On 1/6/25 10:53 PM, Titus G wrote: > On 3/01/25 09:12, Tony Nance wrote: >> On 1/1/25 10:56 PM, Titus G wrote: >>> On 2/01/25 04:43, James Nicoll wrote: >>>> Is that means I have space to start stuff. >>>> >>> snip >>>> The Realized World >>>> >>>> A tour of the works of Walter Jon Williams. >>>> >>>> https://jamesdavisnicoll.com/post/the-realized-world >>>> >>>> Not sure if I will include his historical novels or not. >>> >>> I enjoyed his Dread Empire's Fall series with the third book the best. >>> The Accidental War, Praxis 1, was good but Fleet Elements disappointing >>> with much redundancy and similarity to Dread Empire's Fall. >>> Quillifer did not appeal to me at all but Metropolitan and City on Fire >>> were brilliant four star reads. I do not remember the poster(s) but I am >>> sure he was recommended to me here. >> >> With the exception of Quillifer (which I have not read), my WJW >> experience matches yours very well. As such, I highly recommend Aristoi >> (a stand-alone). > > I got a copy the last time you recommended it but didn't get very far > being annoyed with difficult names and honorifics as well as a lot > of awkward unexplained names of procedures based on multiple > personalities inclusive of demons and communications. > This time, it wasn't till I was about half way through that I started to > appreciate and understand what was going on. The already negative > attitude didn't entirely disappear but the story and the responsibility > of "gods" became a lot more interesting. I was surprised with the > completely different perspective and content compared to his space > operas and Metropolitan to the extent that they seem to be written by > different authors. > Esoteric medical terminology, (cricothyroidostomy), weird mental powers, > (swadhishatana chakra), complex musical terminology, (isorythmic > polyphony) and the nature of the oneirochronic world slowed reading and > also confused me. 3 stars but I suspect that with a reread it might hit > 4 because I would have a better understanding whilst rereading the first > half. Thank you. > Ah - apologies that I did not remember already recommending it to you. Glad it went better for you this time. It is indeed an interesting contrast with his space operas and Metropolitan. Tony