| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vlm93g$2s1vg$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Steve Bonine <spb@pobox.com> Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: 1st RfD: Mass-deletion of moderated groups without a moderator Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 10:28:30 -0600 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 21 Message-ID: <vlm93g$2s1vg$1@dont-email.me> References: <vla2t6$5g57$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 17:28:33 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="37aa86fe2e891df728b78cfc640336d0"; logging-data="3016688"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19iW9y4X3OI4mIsVyHmFG9E" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20 Cancel-Lock: sha1:cRtbv9nZ8lumve9CX9tG1sYo/5Y= In-Reply-To: <vla2t6$5g57$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2159 Big-8 Management Board wrote: > REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD) > > This is a formal Request for Discussion (RFD) to remove the following > 101 moderated newsgroups. When these groups are removed, the history associated with the contents of the group will disappear. I do not know how much this matters. There are cases where someone doing research could use the information, but it is rare. But when it's gone, it's gone. If I thought that the removal of 101 groups would make a difference in anything that matters, I would be more supportive. But this is a drop in the bucket in terms of the number of inactive groups. The effect of this change would be to slightly reduce the chance of someone posting into a newsgroup that they found by doing a name search and their action being a waste of time because there is no moderator or no users of the group. The bottom line for me is that it's not worth investing the effort at this point in the life of Usenet. But it's not my time . . .