Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vln75j$31mdc$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Steve Bonine <spb@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: 1st RfD: Mass-deletion of moderated groups without a moderator
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 19:01:36 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <vln75j$31mdc$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vla2t6$5g57$1@dont-email.me> <vlm93g$2s1vg$1@dont-email.me>
 <20250108210042.3565dbdf@ryz.dorfdsl.de> <ydldvlggws.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 02:01:40 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="aba94a7abbfc95207b3b5d547d00695d";
	logging-data="3201452"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ts4jagg+uAPvLbtuqZYuC"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wBf5du2+CUEWogmehWsIzQp9AD4=
In-Reply-To: <ydldvlggws.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com>
Bytes: 3479

Winston wrote:
> Big-8 Management Board wrote:
>>>>                 REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
>>>>
>>>> This is a formal Request for Discussion (RFD) to remove the
>>>> following 101 moderated newsgroups.
> 
> On 08.01.2025 10:28 Uhr Steve Bonine responded:
>>> When these groups are removed, the history associated with the
>>> contents of the group will disappear.  I do not know how much this
>>> matters. There are cases where someone doing research could use the
>>> information, but it is rare.  But when it's gone, it's gone.
>>
> Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> replied:
>> Those groups were mostly unused more than 10 years, most servers won't
>> carry any articles anymore.
> 
> I think the concern is a bit different: there are some hosts that try to
> archive the entire history of their chosen set of newsgroups (e.g.,
> non-binary groups) and that have articles from, say, 21 years ago or
> more.  If removing a newsgroup makes that history unavailable, that's a
> concern.  ISTM that deleting a newsgroup, and the archive host honoring
> that delete control message, would make articles in that group
> unavailable via NNTP, so the archiver would have to set up an alternate
> way of accessing the old articles, even assuming they were careful
> enough to preserve the articles when the group is deleted.

If the server processes the rmgroup in the standard way, you are correct 
that the group will no longer exist on that server, and any history that 
it contains will be lost.  I cannot speak for the actions of the server 
owner, but I suspect that someone who has invested the time to 
accumulate 21 years of history in a newsgroup might intercept the 
control message and set the group to read-only if that is an option for 
the news server they are using.

>> The group's history itself can still be found at the ISC ftp server,
>> all control messages, including descriptions, can be found there.
> 
> I'm assuming ISC's history is the management history of the group, not
> all the articles ever posted to the group.  I don't think that's the
> history Steve is concerned about.

You're right, it's the contents of the group that may be the only place 
that some of the history of the Internet is documented.