Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 17:12:14 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <vlosgu$3ecjr$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>
 <9c18a839-9ab4-4778-84f2-481c77444254@att.net> <vl87n4$3qnct$1@dont-email.me>
 <6db7afa9-f1e1-4d2b-beba-a5fc7a8b8686@att.net> <vl952v$3vk28$1@dont-email.me>
 <e97ca358-cc9c-4f6f-a93b-3459821fc4aa@att.net> <vl9ev9$1u2d$1@dont-email.me>
 <53806d5c-f456-4c13-8506-24c0b9ab310e@att.net> <vlas93$cr0l$1@dont-email.me>
 <931a709f-7dc7-46ed-a1a2-d0e1b60fc542@att.net> <vldp55$vlah$5@dont-email.me>
 <0c4df4ba-a731-46ce-b2ef-80a497cf58eb@att.net> <vlh45n$1mcph$3@dont-email.me>
 <vlh73o$1oaah$1@dont-email.me> <vlhbn2$1p52c$1@dont-email.me>
 <vlhj98$1qnj9$1@dont-email.me> <vliqej$24c50$1@dont-email.me>
 <vliteg$2554a$1@dont-email.me> <vlivps$256n8$2@dont-email.me>
 <vljcb4$27v2n$1@dont-email.me> <vljucm$2bao3$1@dont-email.me>
 <bcf134eabdd9ce9fb64d54edb4c5171ce736d481@i2pn2.org>
 <vllf77$2n0ui$1@dont-email.me>
 <f6e462e7c6ad1c44a6a0748119bfba65c92cd549@i2pn2.org>
 <vlm2os$2q8qu$1@dont-email.me>
 <28b36d9c5083dbae0b2773e16b385f0fb14f0fda@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:12:15 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8bdf9882f6615ad69bf0d8eeafdc41b8";
	logging-data="3617403"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Qnw8WcbPr4jxmO4cqh20p5nf7Vsgt4UA="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5J7a3xnBR4l3wwNY3dtyNgw1Nb0=
In-Reply-To: <28b36d9c5083dbae0b2773e16b385f0fb14f0fda@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2821

On 09.01.2025 02:26, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 1/8/25 9:40 AM, WM wrote:
>> On 08.01.2025 13:25, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 1/8/25 4:06 AM, WM wrote:
>>>> On 08.01.2025 00:30, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Except you don't use *EVERY* FISON, only those below some limit n 
>>>>> that is below a faction of infinity.
>>>>
>>>> Show a FISON that expanded by a factor of 100 or more covers ℕ. Fail!
>>>>
>>> There isn't one, but doesn't need to be.
>>
>> Read your sentence above. Think over its meaning.

> WHat is wrong with it.

You claim that I don't use every FISON because I use only those with 
less than 1 % of |ℕ|. To prove your claim, you must find a larger FISON 
not belonging to every of mine. You can't. Therefore your claim is wrong.

Regard, WM