Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 13:12:11 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <vlpe3b$3hn08$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vkr8j0$t59a$1@dont-email.me>
 <98519289-0542-40ce-886e-b50b401ef8cf@att.net> <vksicn$16oaq$7@dont-email.me>
 <8e95dfce-05e7-4d31-b8f0-43bede36dc9b@att.net> <vl1ckt$2b4hr$1@dont-email.me>
 <53d93728-3442-4198-be92-5c9abe8a0a72@att.net> <vl5tds$39tut$1@dont-email.me>
 <9c18a839-9ab4-4778-84f2-481c77444254@att.net> <vl87n4$3qnct$1@dont-email.me>
 <8ef20494f573dc131234363177017bf9d6b647ee@i2pn2.org>
 <vl95ks$3vk27$2@dont-email.me> <vl9ldf$3796$1@dont-email.me>
 <vlaskd$cr0l$2@dont-email.me> <vlc68u$k8so$1@dont-email.me>
 <vldpj7$vlah$7@dont-email.me>
 <a8b010b748782966268688a38b58fe1a9b4cc087@i2pn2.org>
 <vlei6e$14nve$1@dont-email.me> <66868399-5c4b-4816-9a0c-369aaa824553@att.net>
 <vlir7p$24c51$1@dont-email.me> <417ff6da-86ee-4b3a-b07a-9c6a8eb31368@att.net>
 <vllfof$2n0uj$2@dont-email.me> <07258ab9-eee1-4aae-902a-ba39247d5942@att.net>
 <vlmst2$2vjr0$3@dont-email.me> <vlo6g6$3a9st$1@dont-email.me>
 <vloss8$3ecjr$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 22:12:12 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dc9a5d5b35debff00bf53408719c9f31";
	logging-data="3726344"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/MaogvuKdrJwpgibOM8TZep4q12zwFcVU="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5odByLt4YygO7Nl0vxPWF8IDcwY=
In-Reply-To: <vloss8$3ecjr$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2491

On 1/9/2025 8:18 AM, WM wrote:
> On 09.01.2025 10:56, FromTheRafters wrote:
>> WM explained :
> 
>>> The set {1, 2, 3, ...} is smaller by one element than the set {0, 1, 
>>> 2, 3, ...}.
>>
>> Both sets are equal in size
> 
> No. Both sets appear equal (although everybody can see that they are 
> not) when measured by an insufficient tool.

{ 0, 1, 2, 3, ... } = { 1 - 1, 2 - 1, 3 - 1, 4 - 1, ... }