Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 22:48:22 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <vls4j6$7v2k$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vl5tds$39tut$1@dont-email.me>
 <9c18a839-9ab4-4778-84f2-481c77444254@att.net> <vl87n4$3qnct$1@dont-email.me>
 <8ef20494f573dc131234363177017bf9d6b647ee@i2pn2.org>
 <vl95ks$3vk27$2@dont-email.me> <vl9ldf$3796$1@dont-email.me>
 <vlaskd$cr0l$2@dont-email.me> <vlc68u$k8so$1@dont-email.me>
 <vldpj7$vlah$7@dont-email.me>
 <a8b010b748782966268688a38b58fe1a9b4cc087@i2pn2.org>
 <vlei6e$14nve$1@dont-email.me> <66868399-5c4b-4816-9a0c-369aaa824553@att.net>
 <vlir7p$24c51$1@dont-email.me> <417ff6da-86ee-4b3a-b07a-9c6a8eb31368@att.net>
 <vllfof$2n0uj$2@dont-email.me> <07258ab9-eee1-4aae-902a-ba39247d5942@att.net>
 <vlmst2$2vjr0$3@dont-email.me>
 <1ebbc233d6bab7878b69cae3eda48c7bbfd07f88@i2pn2.org>
 <vlo5f4$39hil$2@dont-email.me>
 <4c89380adaad983f24d5d6a75842aaabbd1adced@i2pn2.org>
 <vloule$3eqsr$1@dont-email.me>
 <ffffed23878945243684de7f2aa9aaaf29564508@i2pn2.org>
 <vlrej9$2m5k$1@dont-email.me> <d6ed4797-65e8-4004-853c-f07a37af0c11@att.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 22:48:23 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a12feca4b63260bf3dc579b800add305";
	logging-data="261204"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+XTLCcSUq/QX6umzWOEPNkDy8KDrK+Md0="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QhrnRKiRIeYjdH8MHJdd6u17aFU=
In-Reply-To: <d6ed4797-65e8-4004-853c-f07a37af0c11@att.net>
Content-Language: en-US

On 10.01.2025 21:08, Jim Burns wrote:

> Where OUR infinityⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ "doesn't work",
> it's you who's saying it doesn't work,

You are inconsistent. You claim that all natural numbers are an 
invariable set. But when all elements are doubled then your set grows, 
showing it is not inc´variable. That is nonsense.

Regards, WM