Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: AI
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 22:41:53 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 106
Message-ID: <vls7nh$8od8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vlrssv$5d0i$1@dont-email.me> <vls368$7o9u$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 23:41:54 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="642a4d287d172f98fabb3fb39cedc5e5";
	logging-data="287144"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+eiohDx0RjR4ibPHAkxTmpqljHd7aEPtg="
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rC0y3Q7KbeINSCmNu/G3WMzaTk4=
Bytes: 5556

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 22:28:40 +0100, Jeroen Belleman wrote:

> On 1/10/25 20:37, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>> Gentlemen,
>> 
>> I've just been goofing around with X's AI assistant, Grok. After
>> feeding in a few straightforward questions and getting surprisingly
>> impressive answers, I decided to try something a bit more subjective to
>> see how it would cope. Here's what happened...
>> 
>> 
>> My question:
>> 
>> Which of the common 'classic' oscillator designs is the most impressive
>> or ingenious from a technical standpoint?
>> 
>> Grok's Answer:
>> 
>>  From a technical standpoint, several classic oscillator designs stand
>>  out
>> for their ingenuity, but one that is often highlighted for its elegance
>> and versatility is the Colpitts oscillator. Here's why:
>> 
>> Design Ingenuity:
>> 
>>      Simplicity and Efficiency:
>>          The Colpitts oscillator uses a simple configuration with a
>> transistor (or vacuum tube in older versions) and a combination of
>> capacitors and an inductor to create a feedback loop. Despite its
>> simplicity, it achieves stable oscillation with just a few components.
>>      Feedback Mechanism:
>>          It employs a capacitive voltage divider for feedback, which is
>> particularly ingenious. The two capacitors in series (C1 and C2) form a
>> voltage divider that provides the necessary phase shift for
>> oscillation. This method naturally provides the correct phase without
>> additional complex circuitry, making it both efficient and reliable.
>>      Frequency Stability:
>>          The frequency of oscillation in a Colpitts oscillator is
>> determined primarily by the LC tank circuit's resonant frequency, which
>> can be calculated as f=12πL(C1⋅C2)/(C1+C2)
>>          . This formula highlights how the design inherently stabilizes
>> frequency through the interaction of inductance and capacitance. The
>> use of capacitors in the feedback loop also helps in reducing the
>> impact of transistor parameter variations on frequency stability.
>>      Versatility:
>>          The Colpitts oscillator can be adapted for use across a wide
>>          range
>> of frequencies from audio to RF. By changing the values of L, C1, and
>> C2, one can easily tune the oscillator to different frequencies, making
>> it adaptable for various applications from radio transmitters to clock
>> generators.
>>      Low Noise and High Purity:
>>          When designed correctly, the Colpitts oscillator can offer low
>> phase noise, which is critical for applications like communication
>> devices where signal purity is paramount. The design inherently
>> minimizes noise by reducing the number of components in the feedback
>> path.
>>      Ease of Adjustment:
>>          Adjusting the frequency is relatively straightforward with
>>          minor
>> changes to the capacitor or inductor values, making it practical for
>> both prototyping and production environments.
>> 
>> 
>> Historical Context:
>> 
>>      Invented by Edwin H. Colpitts in 1918, this oscillator was a
>> breakthrough in the era of vacuum tubes, which were later adapted for
>> transistor use. Its principles have stood the test of time, still being
>> taught and used today in various forms.
>> 
>> 
>> Comparison:
>> 
>>      While other oscillators like the Hartley oscillator (which uses an
>> inductive voltage divider) or the Clapp oscillator (a variation of
>> Colpitts with an additional capacitor for better frequency stability)
>> are also significant, the Colpitts design is often praised for its
>> balance of simplicity, efficiency, and versatility.
>> 
>> 
>> In conclusion, the Colpitts oscillator stands out for its impressive
>> combination of simplicity, effectiveness, and adaptability, making it
>> one of the most ingenious classic oscillator designs from a technical
>> perspective.
>> 
>> 
**************************************************************************
>> 
>> Any observations?
> 
> Yeah. The resonant frequency formula is wrong. To first approximation,
> it's f=1/(2π sqrt(L C1 C2 / (C1+C2))). (Inline algebraic notation is a
> dog...)
> 
> It looks like Grok has trouble reading formulae.
> 
> Of course, it doesn't really know what it's talking about.
> It just ladles out some phrases it gathered from various web sites on
> the subject.
> 
> Jeroen Belleman

The formula error is not Grok's mistake. The sqrt didn't survive the 
cut'n'paste I'm afraid. I didn't reckon on someone spotting that so didn't 
mention it in the OP.