Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 01:13:35 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <vltco0$h8ou$4@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vllm44$2oeeq$1@dont-email.me>
 <vlm2fv$2qk9u$2@dont-email.me> <59af1502-0bc9-4266-b556-6164edb6a8d4@att.net>
 <vlmscv$2vgqf$1@dont-email.me>
 <9a22a29bfd5af29db5bad5f3cae537665b8dafd7@i2pn2.org>
 <vlochd$3akpm$2@dont-email.me> <vlofbp$3c074$1@dont-email.me>
 <vlohk3$3cap7$1@dont-email.me> <vlosfs$3eekp$1@dont-email.me>
 <vlov8s$3eqeg$2@dont-email.me>
 <81834850e9e4fdedeb38ddc1da4df4a1ebe34e07@i2pn2.org>
 <vlpef4$3hn08$4@dont-email.me> <vlpsts$3kemp$3@dont-email.me>
 <vlqqle$3tulu$1@dont-email.me>
 <2f29dfa35175206d66b46a7e27ca16fe6ae1a1eb@i2pn2.org>
 <vlrilv$2m5k$2@dont-email.me>
 <a75f9bd7501f6468092eb516ca3854b951716d35@i2pn2.org>
 <vlrkdf$5enu$1@dont-email.me>
 <09d0c621cf583928d69f8837bad7a2bd66461829@i2pn2.org>
 <vlrs24$6k4j$1@dont-email.me>
 <725291dea848b0d681f7d983a026a5464fec86c9@i2pn2.org>
 <vls3ib$7v2j$1@dont-email.me>
 <b3685a9450872569bdf143e5eb6754379f053005@i2pn2.org>
 <vltbmk$heoh$3@dont-email.me> <vltclj$h8ou$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 10:13:37 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ce024765705e8ff52c0316de8f77e49c";
	logging-data="566046"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+jMipa4qbePxRBZXRxE7fOm4pOg0iZ0pY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ra5/5t8VZ9KPgAncj1w7S2+eVHU=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vltclj$h8ou$3@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3370

On 1/11/2025 1:12 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 1/11/2025 12:55 AM, WM wrote:
>> On 10.01.2025 22:58, joes wrote:
>>> Am Fri, 10 Jan 2025 22:30:52 +0100 schrieb WM:
>>>> On 10.01.2025 21:03, joes wrote:
>>>>> Am Fri, 10 Jan 2025 20:22:44 +0100 schrieb WM:
>>>>
>>>>>> If actual infinity is invariable, then we can take the set ℕ and
>>>>>> consider it as invariable. When we add further elements, it grows.
>>>>> The set N u {w}, for example, is not equal to N. You can't call that
>>>>> invariable.
>>>> Every set in ZF is invariable.
>>> Right. N stays N even when you construct a new set N u {k} (which is
>>> a different set only if k !e N}. So N doesn't "grow".
>>
>> That contradicts the possibility of bijections, because if it has been 
>> finished, you can add further elements and violate completeness. But 
>> since you cannot comprehend this, look at the simpler theorem:
>>
>> Every union of FISONs which stay below a certain threshold stays below 
>> that threshold.
>>
>> I never met a student who doubted this. And I am sure I will never 
>> meet a contrary opinion in a sober brain.
> 
> 
> wow. You make we want to do drugs right now! Smoke shrooms and drink 
> weed? wow. You are a very special person!

https://youtu.be/7YvAYIJSSZY?list=RD7YvAYIJSSZY

ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!