Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vlttua$la3m$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell Subject: Re: Problem with 'rm -i' in ksh Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 15:07:05 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 48 Message-ID: <vlttua$la3m$1@dont-email.me> References: <vlsqmt$fem4$1@dont-email.me> <vltjc3$htgh$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 15:07:06 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a1644839a0307c2f39264ce2a86c076e"; logging-data="698486"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/MpZJIQ/KHksQ6+/M/sawf" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:zTq650VCy2f36ixBoyEMfZkVH4c= X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 In-Reply-To: <vltjc3$htgh$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2877 On 11.01.2025 12:06, Lem Novantotto wrote: > Il Sat, 11 Jan 2025 05:05:48 +0100, Janis Papanagnou ha scritto: > >> Does that effect - interaction of rm -i behavior with non-interactive >> ksh, flushing the confirmation messages! - sound familiar to anybody? >> >> (I get the same behavior with 'ksh 93u' and 'ksh 93u+m', BTW.) > > Uhmmm... here it works. But maybe I'm missing something... Yes, just these commands in a script work also in my environment. (That was what I meant when I wrote: "constructing a test sample from scratch"; it didn't lead me anywhere, since it just wasn't reproducible in a primitive context like that.) I think it must have to do with the shell environment that in some way affects how 'rm -i' behaves. But I have no idea how an external (shell-environment-)condition could look like that makes an executed program like 'rm' behave as if all '-i' confirmations are "magically" considered as being each answered by "no" (without me typing anything). Janis > >> 11:59:35<lem@biggy:/tmp/prova$ cat mioscript > #!/bin/ksh > unset f_names > typeset -A f_names > f_names["file1"]= > f_names["file2"]= > f_names["file3 3"]= > echo "${!f_names[@]}" > rm -i "${!f_names[@]}" >> 11:59:43<lem@biggy:/tmp/prova$ ./mioscript > file1 file2 file3 3 > rm: rimuovere file regolare vuoto 'file1'? n > rm: rimuovere file regolare vuoto 'file2'? n > rm: rimuovere file regolare vuoto 'file3 3'? n >> 12:00:28<lem@biggy:/tmp/prova$ ksh ./mioscript > file1 file2 file3 3 > rm: rimuovere file regolare vuoto 'file1'? n > rm: rimuovere file regolare vuoto 'file2'? n > rm: rimuovere file regolare vuoto 'file3 3'? n >> 12:00:38<lem@biggy:/tmp/prova$ ksh --version > version sh (AT&T Research) 93u+m/1.0.8 2024-01-01 >