Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 13:45:29 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <vm0dh9$15ccj$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vlm2fv$2qk9u$2@dont-email.me>
 <59af1502-0bc9-4266-b556-6164edb6a8d4@att.net> <vlmscv$2vgqf$1@dont-email.me>
 <9a22a29bfd5af29db5bad5f3cae537665b8dafd7@i2pn2.org>
 <vlochd$3akpm$2@dont-email.me> <vlofbp$3c074$1@dont-email.me>
 <vlohk3$3cap7$1@dont-email.me> <vlosfs$3eekp$1@dont-email.me>
 <vlov8s$3eqeg$2@dont-email.me>
 <81834850e9e4fdedeb38ddc1da4df4a1ebe34e07@i2pn2.org>
 <vlpef4$3hn08$4@dont-email.me> <vlpsts$3kemp$3@dont-email.me>
 <vlqqle$3tulu$1@dont-email.me>
 <2f29dfa35175206d66b46a7e27ca16fe6ae1a1eb@i2pn2.org>
 <vlrilv$2m5k$2@dont-email.me>
 <a75f9bd7501f6468092eb516ca3854b951716d35@i2pn2.org>
 <vlrkdf$5enu$1@dont-email.me>
 <09d0c621cf583928d69f8837bad7a2bd66461829@i2pn2.org>
 <vlrs24$6k4j$1@dont-email.me>
 <725291dea848b0d681f7d983a026a5464fec86c9@i2pn2.org>
 <vls3ib$7v2j$1@dont-email.me>
 <b3685a9450872569bdf143e5eb6754379f053005@i2pn2.org>
 <vltbmk$heoh$3@dont-email.me> <vltclj$h8ou$3@dont-email.me>
 <vlvg6r$112gt$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 13:45:30 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="12b77b53e2dfb1366c2321c2e7d191b6";
	logging-data="1225107"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/d8C3KpATBDq6j5Zpg+geOrU8bm7lk2Bc="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xQZfLHW0qRTwwfRPhgoS6yQGAak=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vlvg6r$112gt$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2447

On 12.01.2025 05:24, Moebius wrote:
> 
>> On 1/11/2025 12:55 AM, WM wrote:
> 
>>> Every union of FISONs which stay below a certain threshold stays 
>>> below that threshold.
> 
> Nope. All FISONs are "subset smaller" than IN, but the union of all 
> FISONs equals IN.

Aren't you ashamed to propagate such a nonsense? All FISONs unioned 
together are less than |ℕ|/n for every definable n.

Regards, WM