Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vm1v8a$2tk9v$1@news.xmission.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!xmission!nnrp.xmission!.POSTED.shell.xmission.com!not-for-mail From: gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell Subject: Iterating over a set in bash (Was: Problem with 'rm -i' in ksh) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:54:02 -0000 (UTC) Organization: The official candy of the new Millennium Message-ID: <vm1v8a$2tk9v$1@news.xmission.com> References: <vlsqmt$fem4$1@dont-email.me> <vm0ela$15i9h$1@dont-email.me> <vm0inq$2st9j$1@news.xmission.com> <vm0no6$17127$1@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:54:02 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.xmission.com; posting-host="shell.xmission.com:166.70.8.4"; logging-data="3068223"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xmission.com" X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Originator: gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) Bytes: 2157 Lines: 38 In article <vm0no6$17127$1@dont-email.me>, Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> wrote: .... >What (other, "better/cleaner") idioms were you thinking of? In general, when I need to iterate over a set (in bash), I use "mapfile". So, instead of: ... | while read ... I will do: mapfile -t < <(...) for i in "${MAPFILE[@]}"; do ... done I think more or less the same is available in ksh. Oh, and another thing of interest to the original thread. We were talking about whether the real underlying problem in the "rm" command could or should be fixed. I did some reading and some testing. "man rm" (on Linux) does mention stdin being a terminal - implying, somewhat obliquely, that the -i option checks that and behaves differently if stdin is not a terminal. However, the below does in fact remove the file (*), which suggests that the implementation is not quite up to the man page: $ touch /tmp/foo $ echo y > /tmp/bar $ rm -iv /tmp/foo < /tmp/bar (*) With the expected weird onscreen display/look. -- Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz claims that only ugly women want abortions, which they will never need since no one will impregnate them.