Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:56:54 -0500
Organization: Peripheral Visions
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <vm90dq$32ltv$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>   <417ff6da-86ee-4b3a-b07a-9c6a8eb31368@att.net> <vllfof$2n0uj$2@dont-email.me> <07258ab9-eee1-4aae-902a-ba39247d5942@att.net> <vlmst2$2vjr0$3@dont-email.me> <1ebbc233d6bab7878b69cae3eda48c7bbfd07f88@i2pn2.org> <vlo5f4$39hil$2@dont-email.me> <4c89380adaad983f24d5d6a75842aaabbd1adced@i2pn2.org> <vloule$3eqsr$1@dont-email.me> <ffffed23878945243684de7f2aa9aaaf29564508@i2pn2.org> <vlrej9$2m5k$1@dont-email.me> <d6ed4797-65e8-4004-853c-f07a37af0c11@att.net> <vls4j6$7v2k$3@dont-email.me> <494bfd3b-3c70-4d8d-9c70-ce917c15fc22@att.net> <vm0okb$16cq0$2@dont-email.me> <bff18686-503a-4b7b-9406-b47796f68b47@att.net> <vm15pj$18v7t$1@dont-email.me> <72142d82-0d71-460a-a1be-cadadf78c048@att.net> <vm3hrs$1s9ld$2@dont-email.me> <vm3ujn$219a9$1@dont-email.me> <vm55n7$2aug0$1@dont-email.me> <vm57is$2b5ia$1@dont-email.me> <27027d990b20abb4ed0cf234f92ce122ea84375b@i2pn2.org> <vm636m$2g1om$1@dont-email.me> <vm8tai$31v8s$4@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: erratic.howard@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 19:56:58 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="34d46ed5904c7d19b927cfb11f166d0b";
	logging-data="3233727"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18a5pTv0LBB+BB3rMBMh9ZiIx40il8ziwA="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:dLTAbZSh06+roLz6E+rgmrL8Yug=
X-ICQ: 1701145376
X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb
Bytes: 2151

WM formulated the question :
> On 14.01.2025 17:25, FromTheRafters wrote:
>
>> How is division of ordinals defined?
>
> It is the opposite of multiplication.

No, it is not.