Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vmaqfu$3fd0d$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 06:27:58 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 25 Message-ID: <vmaqfu$3fd0d$2@dont-email.me> References: <1VcgP.54962$XfF8.39289@fx04.iad> <vm1itg$1f1ma$3@dont-email.me> <vm40cl$21e8l$2@dont-email.me> <6h1bojt7kdp4d5euq0f78rtuvqpg7edc3e@4ax.com> <vm86er$2u8jo$1@dont-email.me> <cqlfoj93e6jvua3is08kbm6f9p32h8cl4a@4ax.com> <vm8o1d$313ov$1@dont-email.me> <luq81qFfc8fU2@mid.individual.net> <vm8rh6$31mgm$1@dont-email.me> <vma658$3cm4n$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 12:27:59 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c4d44e581f4ef83f8dff591f869ad48e"; logging-data="3650573"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Q2d3NC////gY8XiKZZv9sX3byjmMOh2I=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:p+scDl3sfUn94VgkYEme1pfqaJA= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vma658$3cm4n$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2466 On 1/16/25 12:40 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 12:33:26 -0500, -hh wrote: > >> IMO the mini had historically been Apple's product to promote desktop >> customers to migrate from Windows, but its shortcomings have centered >> around how 90% of the market ignored it because it wasn't a laptop, and >> the other 10% are tower fetish geeks who were offended because it >> couldn't easily address every possible niche/corner use case. > > Everything Apple sells in its “Macintosh” range is effectively a laptop > now, just packaged differently. In its move to ARM chips, it has > completely sacrificed all the traditional expandability that came with > desktop/workstation machines. Yeah, so? Over 80% of the total PC market today are laptops. The old school paradigm of getting elbows-deep into component upgrades is a niche that's going to continue to be considered irrelevant by the mainstream: I've already seen some components whose prices are far higher than what they _should_ be, as state-of-the-shelf commodities. -hh