Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vmboup$3l2jo$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Rich <rich@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.os.linux.mint
Subject: Re: smart plugs???
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:07:53 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <vmboup$3l2jo$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vm8nvf$312bv$1@dont-email.me> <vm95vu$33jb9$1@dont-email.me> <vmajoo$3eg41$1@dont-email.me> <vmanfp$3f251$6@dont-email.me> <70892435-a326-11bb-0e95-cde8e098caa1@example.net>
Injection-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:07:53 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e883e0f3b2b433100952970dffbd380e";
	logging-data="3836536"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18woRi8owDDevM9aNdJ75eY"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:D07tHTERINL69AbK/dMJC/jzdGs=
Bytes: 2214

In comp.os.linux.misc D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> 
>> On 16/01/2025 09:33, Mike Scott wrote:
>>> On 15/01/2025 20:31, Pancho wrote:
>>>> I think you have to be careful that they are not controlled by a 
>>>> cloud service.  If you have a cloud service you need a working wan 
>>>> connection and you are exposed to the cloud service provider 
>>>> disappearing.
>>> 
>>> (Thanks to all for replying)
>>> 
>>> This is the rub.  tp-link clearly /want/ the consumer to use their 
>>> "cloud" service - which is usually just a fancy codeword for 'we 
>>> want your data'.  There's no actual /need/ that I can see in this 
>>> case.
>>> 
>> Actually there is.
>>
>> It is the simple way to solve 'remote access' to your 'behind NAS' 
>> network connected gadgets
>>
>> Now *we* can organise that because we are geeks, but te average 
>> coinsumer?  Doan mak me larf!
> 
> I use tor to give me a globally unique name where I can access my 
> stuff behind NAT as a Tor hidden service.

99.1% of the total users would be incapable of achieving what you are 
doing with Tor, even if given infinite time to set it all up.